AIMS microbiology · 2026
Gut microbiota and the gut-brain axis in autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A scoping review of shared and disorder-specific mechanistic pathways.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khanday Shifan, Darmaki Afra Al, Malahifci Rokia, Alvavi Rima, Ahmed Sana, Nasr Dina S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are among the most prevalent neurodevelopmental conditions worldwide, yet the biological mechanisms driving their onset and phenotypic variability remain incompletely understood. The gut-brain axis (GBA), a bidirectional network linking intestinal microbial communities to central nervous system function through endocrine, immune, neural, and metabolic pathways, has emerged as a candidate mechanism through which environmental factors interact with genetic susceptibility to shape neurodevelopmental outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically map the peer-reviewed evidence on gut microbiome-related mechanistic pathways in ASD and ADHD, we delineated features common to both disorders and identified areas of divergence and knowledge gaps requiring further investigation.
METHODS: A scoping review was performed following the PRISMA Extension for the Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed studies published January 2018 through March 2025. Studies addressing gut microbiome composition, GBA signaling, or microbiome-directed interventions in ASD or ADHD were eligible for inclusion. Extracted data were synthesized using inductive thematic analysis via Covidence software.
RESULTS: Forty-five studies satisfied the eligibility criteria. Inductive analysis produced five mechanistic themes: Endocrine dysregulation and microbial metabolite signaling; neuronal signaling and neurotransmitter modulation; immune activation and neuroinflammation; gene-microbiota-environment interactions; and microbiota-targeted interventions. Studies on both disorders demonstrated modifications involving taxa with short-chain-fatty-acid-producing capacity; however, findings were varied and did not prove a common reduction in butyrate production. ASD was marked by pronounced dysregulation of the serotonergic system and tryptophan-kynurenine pathway and increased hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis responsiveness. On the other hand, the results in ADHD were majorly cross-sectional or preliminary, and the widely-m recognized dopaminergic dysfunction in ADHD has not been associated to specific microbiota alterations to date.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence demonstrates the GBA as a useful research conceptual for investigating ASD and ADHD, although the strength of mechanistic evidence differs substantially between the two disorders. Translating these insights into therapeutic strategies will require longitudinal, multi-omic research designs capable of establishing causality and enabling patient stratification for precision microbiome-based interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically map the peer-reviewed evidence on gut microbiome-related mechanistic pathways in ASD and ADHD, we delineated features common to both disorders and identified areas of divergence and knowledge gaps requiring further investigation.
METHODS: A scoping review was performed following the PRISMA Extension for the Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed studies published January 2018 through March 2025. Studies addressing gut microbiome composition, GBA signaling, or microbiome-directed interventions in ASD or ADHD were eligible for inclusion. Extracted data were synthesized using inductive thematic analysis via Covidence software.
RESULTS: Forty-five studies satisfied the eligibility criteria. Inductive analysis produced five mechanistic themes: Endocrine dysregulation and microbial metabolite signaling; neuronal signaling and neurotransmitter modulation; immune activation and neuroinflammation; gene-microbiota-environment interactions; and microbiota-targeted interventions. Studies on both disorders demonstrated modifications involving taxa with short-chain-fatty-acid-producing capacity; however, findings were varied and did not prove a common reduction in butyrate production. ASD was marked by pronounced dysregulation of the serotonergic system and tryptophan-kynurenine pathway and increased hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis responsiveness. On the other hand, the results in ADHD were majorly cross-sectional or preliminary, and the widely-m recognized dopaminergic dysfunction in ADHD has not been associated to specific microbiota alterations to date.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence demonstrates the GBA as a useful research conceptual for investigating ASD and ADHD, although the strength of mechanistic evidence differs substantially between the two disorders. Translating these insights into therapeutic strategies will require longitudinal, multi-omic research designs capable of establishing causality and enabling patient stratification for precision microbiome-based interventions.