DOI 10.1253/circrep.cr-26-0182
Circulating Amino Acids Independently Predict Longitudinal Progression of Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index in Japanese Older Adults: The Kyotango Longevity Cohort Study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Arterial stiffness is an established predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Circulating amino acids have emerged as metabolic markers linked to cardiovascular risk, but longitudinal evidence in community-dwelling Japanese older adults remains limited. Therefore, we investigated whether baseline amino acid profiles predict progression of arterial stiffness, as assessed by the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), in this population.
METHODS AND
RESULTS
This prospective analysis of the Kyotango Longevity Cohort Study included 592 participants aged ≥65 years with repeated CAVI measurements (mean follow-up 3.2±0.5 years). Fasting blood samples were analyzed for 23 amino acids with sufficient data availability at baseline. Primary screening analyses adjusted for age, sex, and baseline CAVI identified glutamic acid, isoleucine, and leucine as significantly associated with greater CAVI increase (q<0.10). After multivariable adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, these associations remained significant. No significant interactions were observed between the identified amino acids and markers of inflammation (interleukin 6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), oxidative stress (8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine), or physical function (grip strength). Branched-chain amino acids and Fischer ratio were also independently associated with CAVI progression.
CONCLUSIONS
Circulating amino acid profiles, particularly glutamic acid, leucine, and isoleucine, together with branched-chain amino acid-derived indices, independently predict longitudinal progression of arterial stiffness as assessed by CAVI in Japanese older adults.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.