Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026
Unmasking Facial Melanosis: A Prospective Clinico-Dermoscopic Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jose Sheethal K, Kuryan Priya Sara, Koikkara Diya Katrina, Mahabal Gauri Dinesh, George Leni, Dincy Peter C V, Pulimood Susanne A, Thomas Meera
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Various entities of acquired facial melanosis present with considerable clinical overlap, posing diagnostic challenges. Dermoscopy is being increasingly used in its diagnosis.
OBJECTIVES: To assess dermoscopic and clinicopathological features of facial melanosis in Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI.
METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of clinical and dermoscopic features of facial melanosis-lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP), pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD), and facial acanthosis nigricans (FAN)-was conducted. Melasma, periorbital hyperpigmentation, and nevus of Ota were excluded.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included: 31 (55.4%) with LPP, 18 (32.1%) FAN, and seven (12.5%) PCD. Clinically, LPP showed significantly more involvement of face (55.2 ± 22.2%) (P=0.029), especially the chin (29, 93.5%) (P=0.006). Dermoscopy revealed more than one pattern of pigment structures in 54 (96.4%) patients. Predominant patterns in LPP were reticular (21, 67.7%), peppered (15, 48.4%), and annular (13, 41.9%). There was an overlap of patterns like annular, annular-granular, and reticular in both LPP and PCD. Peppered (15, 48.4%) was significantly more in LPP (P=0.023), while linear dots were seen exclusively in LPP (4, 12.9%); smudged was significantly more in PCD (6, 85.7%) and FAN (15, 83.3%) (P=0.003). Concentric circles (16, 88.9%) and parallel lines (14, 77.8%) were significantly more in FAN (P<0.001 each), while crypts-gyri (10, 55.6%) and papillary projections (8, 44.4%) were seen exclusively in FAN. Combination of dots and clods was also significantly more in LPP (26, 83.9%; P=0.007), whereas blue-gray pigmentation (19, 61.3%) was observed exclusively in LPP.
CONCLUSION: Distinct dermoscopic features aid in differentiating acquired facial melanosis. Blue-gray dots and clods in peppered, reticular, and linear dots patterns favor LPP, while concentric circles, parallel lines, crypts-gyri, and papillary projections suggest FAN. Recognition of these patterns may obviate biopsy in cosmetically sensitive areas.
OBJECTIVES: To assess dermoscopic and clinicopathological features of facial melanosis in Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI.
METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of clinical and dermoscopic features of facial melanosis-lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP), pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD), and facial acanthosis nigricans (FAN)-was conducted. Melasma, periorbital hyperpigmentation, and nevus of Ota were excluded.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included: 31 (55.4%) with LPP, 18 (32.1%) FAN, and seven (12.5%) PCD. Clinically, LPP showed significantly more involvement of face (55.2 ± 22.2%) (P=0.029), especially the chin (29, 93.5%) (P=0.006). Dermoscopy revealed more than one pattern of pigment structures in 54 (96.4%) patients. Predominant patterns in LPP were reticular (21, 67.7%), peppered (15, 48.4%), and annular (13, 41.9%). There was an overlap of patterns like annular, annular-granular, and reticular in both LPP and PCD. Peppered (15, 48.4%) was significantly more in LPP (P=0.023), while linear dots were seen exclusively in LPP (4, 12.9%); smudged was significantly more in PCD (6, 85.7%) and FAN (15, 83.3%) (P=0.003). Concentric circles (16, 88.9%) and parallel lines (14, 77.8%) were significantly more in FAN (P<0.001 each), while crypts-gyri (10, 55.6%) and papillary projections (8, 44.4%) were seen exclusively in FAN. Combination of dots and clods was also significantly more in LPP (26, 83.9%; P=0.007), whereas blue-gray pigmentation (19, 61.3%) was observed exclusively in LPP.
CONCLUSION: Distinct dermoscopic features aid in differentiating acquired facial melanosis. Blue-gray dots and clods in peppered, reticular, and linear dots patterns favor LPP, while concentric circles, parallel lines, crypts-gyri, and papillary projections suggest FAN. Recognition of these patterns may obviate biopsy in cosmetically sensitive areas.