Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2014
Screening colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy: implications of a negative examination for cancer prevention and racial disparities in average-risk patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Bechien U, Longstreth George F, Ngor Eunis W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Both colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy are accepted procedures for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To compare risk of CRC after negative findings on screening colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy and to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in postscreening CRC.
DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative cohort study.
SETTING: Integrated community-based health-care system.
PATIENTS: Average-risk patients 50 to 75 years of age with negative findings on an initial endoscopic screening examination from January 2000 to December 2010.
INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy as the initial screening procedure.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Incident cases of CRC identified via a prospective internal cancer registry, risk of CRC determined by Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 138,297 patients (42,938 patients with negative findings on colonoscopy and 95,359 with negative findings on sigmoidoscopy). The median age was 57.9 years (interquartile range 53.0-64.1 years). Women comprised 51.8% of the cohort with 42.2% non-Hispanic white patients, 24.1% Hispanic patients, 10.7% non-Hispanic black patients, 9.7% Asian patients, and 13.3% other/unknown. A total of 241 cases of CRC was detected during 553,543 person-years of follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of postscreening CRC was 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.64; P < .0001) for colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy. Risk reduction was primarily among proximal tumors (adjusted HR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57). Non-Hispanic black patients were at higher risk of postscreening CRC compared with non-Hispanic white patients (adjusted HR 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20-2.42); however, this disparity was noted only in the sigmoidoscopy cohort.
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study with potential selection bias and residual confounding.
CONCLUSIONS: Negative screening colonoscopy was associated with decreased incidence of subsequent CRC and a decrease in disparities compared with negative sigmoidoscopy findings in this large, community-based setting.
OBJECTIVE: To compare risk of CRC after negative findings on screening colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy and to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in postscreening CRC.
DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative cohort study.
SETTING: Integrated community-based health-care system.
PATIENTS: Average-risk patients 50 to 75 years of age with negative findings on an initial endoscopic screening examination from January 2000 to December 2010.
INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy as the initial screening procedure.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Incident cases of CRC identified via a prospective internal cancer registry, risk of CRC determined by Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 138,297 patients (42,938 patients with negative findings on colonoscopy and 95,359 with negative findings on sigmoidoscopy). The median age was 57.9 years (interquartile range 53.0-64.1 years). Women comprised 51.8% of the cohort with 42.2% non-Hispanic white patients, 24.1% Hispanic patients, 10.7% non-Hispanic black patients, 9.7% Asian patients, and 13.3% other/unknown. A total of 241 cases of CRC was detected during 553,543 person-years of follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of postscreening CRC was 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.64; P < .0001) for colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy. Risk reduction was primarily among proximal tumors (adjusted HR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57). Non-Hispanic black patients were at higher risk of postscreening CRC compared with non-Hispanic white patients (adjusted HR 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20-2.42); however, this disparity was noted only in the sigmoidoscopy cohort.
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study with potential selection bias and residual confounding.
CONCLUSIONS: Negative screening colonoscopy was associated with decreased incidence of subsequent CRC and a decrease in disparities compared with negative sigmoidoscopy findings in this large, community-based setting.