Multisystem aging discordance and cognitive decline in Chinese older adults: A longitudinal study from CHARLS.
Аннотация
BackgroundMultisystem aging discordance may represent an early risk factor for cognitive decline, but prospective evidence in Chinese older adults is limited.ObjectiveWe constructed a blood-based Aging Discordance Index (ADI) and examined its 3-year association with cognitive function in a nationally representative Chinese cohort. ADI was derived from five routine biomarkers (creatinine, total cholesterol, C-reactive protein, mean corpuscular volume, and glycated hemoglobin).MethodsData were from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). ADI was calculated as the standard deviation of age-adjusted Z-scores. Cognitive function was assessed via orientation, calculation, drawing, and equated word recall in 2018 data. Survey-weighted linear regression adjusted for baseline cognition, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical covariates.ResultsAmong 1688 participants aged ≥60 years, higher ADI was independently associated with worse 3-year cognitive performance (fully adjusted β = -0.336, 95% CI: -0.598 to -0.075, p = 0.011) and greater cognitive decline (β = -0.326, 95% CI: -0.575 to -0.077, p = 0.010). To address potential bias due to loss to follow-up, we further applied linear mixed models (LMM) with random intercepts in an expanded sample of 2912 participants, which utilizes all available repeated measures. The ADI × time interaction remained significant (β = -0.346, 95% CI: -0.580 to -0.112, p = 0.004), confirming the robustness of the primary findings against attrition bias.ConclusionsA simple blood-based index of multisystem aging discordance independently predicts cognitive decline in Chinese older adults. ADI may offer a practical, low-cost tool for early risk stratification in community settings.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.