Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026
Determinants of vulnerability and onset of depression during pregnancy: Evidence from the PRESeNT cohort.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Benedetto Maria Grazia, Singh Solorzano Claudio, Gamba Fabio, Casirati Anna, Rosa Melissa, Lanzani Elena, Barbato Lucrezia, Pontoglio Francesca, Bonelli Sharon, Elia Rosalba, Pecis Daniela, Villa Antonella, Regispani Francesca, Reina Lucia, Sanna Barbara, De Filippis Roberta, Fantini Gabriella, Olivola Miriam, Anniverno Roberta, Riva Marco A, Cattaneo Annamaria
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Antenatal depression is a major public health concern, yet the factors distinguishing clinically manifest symptoms from underlying vulnerability remain poorly understood. This study examined a range of dimensions to identify determinants of antenatal depression and subclinical risk.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty-one pregnant women participating in the PRESeNT cohort study have been stratified as controls (n = 71), at risk of depression during pregnancy (n = 107), or with antenatal depressive symptoms (n = 53). Assessments included psychological measures (depressive symptoms, general and pregnancy-related anxiety, stress exposure and perception, and childhood trauma), along with sociodemographic, relational, health-related, lifestyle, and obstetric variables. Group differences were tested using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests, and correlations among psychological variables were examined using Spearman's rank test. Elastic net penalized logistic regression with cross-validation was applied to identify predictors distinguishing depressed from at-risk women.
RESULTS: At-risk and depressed women reported higher levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety, perceived stress, and childhood trauma when compared to controls. Depressed women were more likely to be single, report poorer self-rated health, endorse pre-pregnancy substance use, and have a history of spontaneous miscarriage. In elastic net models distinguishing depressed from at-risk women, higher trait anxiety (OR = 1.11, p = 0.024) and perceived stress (OR = 1.15, p = 0.025) independently predicted depressed status.
CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal depression appears to be embedded within broader psychological vulnerability during pregnancy. While several relational, obstetric, lifestyle, and trauma-related characteristics were associated with group differences, psychological factors showed the strongest contribution. These findings support the implementation of integrated psychosocial screening during pregnancy to enable earlier identification and preventive care.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty-one pregnant women participating in the PRESeNT cohort study have been stratified as controls (n = 71), at risk of depression during pregnancy (n = 107), or with antenatal depressive symptoms (n = 53). Assessments included psychological measures (depressive symptoms, general and pregnancy-related anxiety, stress exposure and perception, and childhood trauma), along with sociodemographic, relational, health-related, lifestyle, and obstetric variables. Group differences were tested using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests, and correlations among psychological variables were examined using Spearman's rank test. Elastic net penalized logistic regression with cross-validation was applied to identify predictors distinguishing depressed from at-risk women.
RESULTS: At-risk and depressed women reported higher levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety, perceived stress, and childhood trauma when compared to controls. Depressed women were more likely to be single, report poorer self-rated health, endorse pre-pregnancy substance use, and have a history of spontaneous miscarriage. In elastic net models distinguishing depressed from at-risk women, higher trait anxiety (OR = 1.11, p = 0.024) and perceived stress (OR = 1.15, p = 0.025) independently predicted depressed status.
CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal depression appears to be embedded within broader psychological vulnerability during pregnancy. While several relational, obstetric, lifestyle, and trauma-related characteristics were associated with group differences, psychological factors showed the strongest contribution. These findings support the implementation of integrated psychosocial screening during pregnancy to enable earlier identification and preventive care.