MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026

Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Sensory Arousal Nursing for Post-Stroke Dysphagia.

СтатьяVideo-Audio MediaРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Hu Chunling, Liu Ling, Mao Shanhua, Ming Meihong, Chen Min, Yue Zhuang

Аннотация

Post-stroke dysphagia can compromise airway protection, nutrition, and functional recovery. This article describes a clinical protocol combining low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with a structured sensory arousal nursing package for patients with acute ischemic stroke and dysphagia accompanied by feeding-related upper-limb dysfunction. Dysphagia is the primary treatment focus; upper-limb activities address associated limitations in self-feeding. The protocol integrates screening, stimulation safety review, motor-threshold determination, contralesional swallowing-motor targeting, 1 Hz rTMS, sequenced sensory input, feeding-related task practice, and outcome assessment. Representative results come from a single-center, randomized, assessor-blinded study of 160 patients (80 per group) comparing the combined intervention with routine nursing for swallowing rehabilitation over 2 weeks. The between-group difference in Standardized Swallowing Assessment change was -3.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.8 to -2.0; p < 0.001). The between-group change-score differences were 0.8 levels for the Functional Oral Intake Scale (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.2; p < 0.001) and -0.9 points for the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (95% CI, -1.5 to -0.3; p = 0.004), the latter restricted to participants with paired instrumental assessments (48 versus 46). Aspiration pneumonia occurred in 5/80 versus 11/80 participants (p = 0.118); no serious rTMS-related adverse events were reported. These findings indicate short-term differences in scale scores but do not establish a clinically important benefit in swallowing or a reduced risk of pneumonia. The protocol coordinates established rehabilitation components. Further studies are needed to determine their individual effects and identify patients who may benefit from contralesional inhibition.

Предметные рубрики MeSH