Child abuse & neglect · 2026
Associations between abuse, neglect, and at-risk family interactions with adolescent psychiatric disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Belbèze J, Silva J, Corcos M, Robin M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: While maltreatment is a well-established risk factor for psychopathology, recent literature highlights the need to consider the role of broader family dynamics in shaping diagnostic outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This study adopts a framework that integrates both formal abuse/neglect and at-risk family interactions, aiming to identify diagnosis-specific adversity profiles.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: This cross-sectional analysis, conducted at a single site as part of the Family and Care study, includes hospitalized adolescents diagnosed with one or more conditions from nine diagnostic categories. Participants were recruited over a 4-year period in an 8-bed psychiatric unit within a university-affiliated psychiatric department.
METHOD: Data on abuse and neglect were collected through the European Child Abuse and Neglect dataset and the At-Risk Family Interactions and Levers (ARFIL) scale, a 30-item clinical tool, measured family interactions. We hypothesized that patterns of maltreatment and at-risk relationships would vary by diagnosis.
RESULTS: Among the 425 participants, emotional abuse prevalence was 46.1 %, physical abuse 21.4 %, sexual abuse 25.1 %, and neglect 70.5 %. Significant differences by age, gender, global assessment of functioning scores, and hospitalization duration were observed between diagnostic groups (p < .05). Personality, Oppositional Defiant, and Trauma and Stress-related Disorders showed higher ARFIL diversity and intensity scores compared to other diagnoses, highlighting the distinct influence of at-risk family dynamics in addition to formal abuse or neglect. All diagnoses exhibited a specific set of associations but mood and psychotic disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: Distinct maltreatment and at-risk family interaction profiles were associated with specific diagnoses. Assessing both maltreatment and family dynamics enhances understanding of patient environments and provides targeted therapeutic insights.
OBJECTIVE: This study adopts a framework that integrates both formal abuse/neglect and at-risk family interactions, aiming to identify diagnosis-specific adversity profiles.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: This cross-sectional analysis, conducted at a single site as part of the Family and Care study, includes hospitalized adolescents diagnosed with one or more conditions from nine diagnostic categories. Participants were recruited over a 4-year period in an 8-bed psychiatric unit within a university-affiliated psychiatric department.
METHOD: Data on abuse and neglect were collected through the European Child Abuse and Neglect dataset and the At-Risk Family Interactions and Levers (ARFIL) scale, a 30-item clinical tool, measured family interactions. We hypothesized that patterns of maltreatment and at-risk relationships would vary by diagnosis.
RESULTS: Among the 425 participants, emotional abuse prevalence was 46.1 %, physical abuse 21.4 %, sexual abuse 25.1 %, and neglect 70.5 %. Significant differences by age, gender, global assessment of functioning scores, and hospitalization duration were observed between diagnostic groups (p < .05). Personality, Oppositional Defiant, and Trauma and Stress-related Disorders showed higher ARFIL diversity and intensity scores compared to other diagnoses, highlighting the distinct influence of at-risk family dynamics in addition to formal abuse or neglect. All diagnoses exhibited a specific set of associations but mood and psychotic disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: Distinct maltreatment and at-risk family interaction profiles were associated with specific diagnoses. Assessing both maltreatment and family dynamics enhances understanding of patient environments and provides targeted therapeutic insights.