Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026
Clinicopathological Evolution of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid-induced Liver Injury: Transition From SOS to PSVD?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Si, Zhang Feng, Liu Yao, Zeng Shuyan, Zhang Han, Tu Jingjing, Xu Hui, Yin Qin, Zhang Wei, Xu Bing, Xiao Jiangqiang, Wang Lei, García-Pagán Juan Carlos, Chen Jun, Zhuge Yuzheng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is characterized by hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell injury and detachment, hepatic sinusoidal congestion, and hepatic cell necrosis. Currently, limited data exist concerning changes during the recovery period, especially histopathological changes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the evolution of pathology in patients with pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA)-induced SOS and in a monocrotaline-induced SOS rat model.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PA-induced SOS who underwent liver biopsy after achieving clinical remission were consecutively enrolled in this retrospective study. To compare the clinical and pathological differences between patients with acute and convalescent SOS, a 2:1 matched analysis was performed based on age, sex, treatment regimen, and baseline Drum Tower Severity Scoring (DTSS) during the acute phase. Additionally, an animal model of PA-induced SOS was established through the administration of monocrotaline.
RESULTS: Fourteen consecutive patients with SOS who had adequate liver biopsy specimens obtained during recovery were identified. During convalescence, most laboratory and imaging findings, such as the map-like enhancement observed on computed tomography, also disappeared. However, histopathological analysis revealed a distinct shift from hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell injury in the acute phase to portal tract abnormalities, primarily characterized by portal vein stricture, in the recovery phase. These pathological changes were corroborated in our animal model.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that both patients with PA-induced SOS and rats in the convalescent stage may exhibit porto-sinusoidal vascular disease-like changes. Regular follow-up and dynamic pathological assessment are therefore recommended to facilitate the early detection of potential signs of portal hypertension.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PA-induced SOS who underwent liver biopsy after achieving clinical remission were consecutively enrolled in this retrospective study. To compare the clinical and pathological differences between patients with acute and convalescent SOS, a 2:1 matched analysis was performed based on age, sex, treatment regimen, and baseline Drum Tower Severity Scoring (DTSS) during the acute phase. Additionally, an animal model of PA-induced SOS was established through the administration of monocrotaline.
RESULTS: Fourteen consecutive patients with SOS who had adequate liver biopsy specimens obtained during recovery were identified. During convalescence, most laboratory and imaging findings, such as the map-like enhancement observed on computed tomography, also disappeared. However, histopathological analysis revealed a distinct shift from hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell injury in the acute phase to portal tract abnormalities, primarily characterized by portal vein stricture, in the recovery phase. These pathological changes were corroborated in our animal model.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that both patients with PA-induced SOS and rats in the convalescent stage may exhibit porto-sinusoidal vascular disease-like changes. Regular follow-up and dynamic pathological assessment are therefore recommended to facilitate the early detection of potential signs of portal hypertension.