AI-derived Histopathological Signatures Are Associated With Response to Mepolizumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.
Аннотация
BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease with variable response to biologic therapy. Tissue-based predictors of treatment response are limited, and conventional eosinophil-focused histopathology has shown inconsistent predictive value.ObjectiveTo assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-derived baseline histopathology of nasal polyps contains information associated with clinical response to mepolizumab in CRSwNP.MethodsThis hypothesis-generating substudy included patients with severe CRSwNP enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Baseline biopsies were analysed using an AI-driven spatial histopathology pipeline extracting 84 morphological features per cell. Features were evaluated in eosinophil-only, noneosinophil, and all-cell configurations. Treatment response at 6 and 12 months was defined using EUFOREA criteria. Linear discriminant analysis and partial least squares regression were applied.ResultsFifty-eight patients were included. At 12 months, the eosinophil-only model showed limited discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.43), the noneosinophil model moderate discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.62), and the all-cell model the highest performance (AUC ≈ 0.75). At 6 months, all models showed limited discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.49). For continuous outcomes, noneosinophil models explained the greatest variance (R2 up to ≈ 0.34).ConclusionAI-derived baseline histopathology contains information associated with clinical response to mepolizumab in CRSwNP. Models incorporating the broader tissue microenvironment outperformed eosinophil-focused approaches, supporting the potential of computational pathology for pretreatment stratification of biologic therapy in CRSwNP.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.