MedElevator
Войти в исследования Frontiers in health services · 2026
Content validity of the Chinese version of the PRAP scale: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Yulin, Wang Yingwen, Fu Weijia, Wang Beibei, Zhang Yanhong, Kang Qiongfang, Zhang Xiaobo, Gu Ying
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the content validity of the Chinese-language version of the PRAP scale from comprehensive perspectives within the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) framework.
METHODS: We evaluated the content validity of the Chinese PRAP scale using COSMIN methodology in a convergent parallel mixed-methods design (August 2022-November 2023) at a tertiary children's hospital in Shanghai, with 57 content validity raters including nurses, social workers, and family caregivers. Quantitative (I-CVI, S-CVI/Ave) and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were integrated.
RESULTS: The scale showed strong overall content validity based on the quantitative ratings (S-CVI/Ave = 0.92). Item 5 ("Parent/caregiver stress") showed the lowest relevance rating (I-CVI = 0.79). Qualitative feedback identified ambiguous phrasing in Items 4 and 5 and inconsistent interpretation of professional terminology.
CONCLUSION: Despite uncertainties in comprehensibility identified by qualitative insights, the findings provide evidence supporting the content validity of the Chinese PRAP scale, while acknowledging that further psychometric evaluation is required.
METHODS: We evaluated the content validity of the Chinese PRAP scale using COSMIN methodology in a convergent parallel mixed-methods design (August 2022-November 2023) at a tertiary children's hospital in Shanghai, with 57 content validity raters including nurses, social workers, and family caregivers. Quantitative (I-CVI, S-CVI/Ave) and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were integrated.
RESULTS: The scale showed strong overall content validity based on the quantitative ratings (S-CVI/Ave = 0.92). Item 5 ("Parent/caregiver stress") showed the lowest relevance rating (I-CVI = 0.79). Qualitative feedback identified ambiguous phrasing in Items 4 and 5 and inconsistent interpretation of professional terminology.
CONCLUSION: Despite uncertainties in comprehensibility identified by qualitative insights, the findings provide evidence supporting the content validity of the Chinese PRAP scale, while acknowledging that further psychometric evaluation is required.