Health affairs scholar · 2026
Effects of the enhanced nurse licensure compact on interstate mobility and nursing employment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tiunn Hong-Lun, Luo Qian Eric, Herring Jordan, Pittman Patricia
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The United States continues to face persistent nursing shortages, even as many licensed nurses are not employed in nursing roles. The enhanced Nurse Licensure Compact (NLC 2.0), a mutual licensure recognition agreement, is promoted as a strategy to increase workforce supply and flexibility, yet no prior research has assessed whether it helps licensed but nonpracticing nurses return to the profession.
METHODS: Using American Community Survey data (2010-2023) and state-level licensure and employment data (2015-2023), we evaluated whether NLC 2.0 adoption is associated with changes in interstate registered nurse (RN) inflows and in the license-employment mismatch-the share of active licenses not linked to payroll nursing employment-across 26 states.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant effect on interstate migration (+0.27 percentage points; P = 0.67). However, adoption was associated with a 3.30-percentage-point reduction in the share of licensed nurses not employed in nursing (P = 0.054), with the effect strengthening over time. A staggered difference-in-differences robustness check confirmed this pattern.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that while the compact does not draw nurses across state lines, it is associated with more licensed nurses working in nursing within adopting states. Licensure reform may therefore be one component of a broader strategy to support nurses' return to bedside roles.
METHODS: Using American Community Survey data (2010-2023) and state-level licensure and employment data (2015-2023), we evaluated whether NLC 2.0 adoption is associated with changes in interstate registered nurse (RN) inflows and in the license-employment mismatch-the share of active licenses not linked to payroll nursing employment-across 26 states.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant effect on interstate migration (+0.27 percentage points; P = 0.67). However, adoption was associated with a 3.30-percentage-point reduction in the share of licensed nurses not employed in nursing (P = 0.054), with the effect strengthening over time. A staggered difference-in-differences robustness check confirmed this pattern.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that while the compact does not draw nurses across state lines, it is associated with more licensed nurses working in nursing within adopting states. Licensure reform may therefore be one component of a broader strategy to support nurses' return to bedside roles.