Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026
Bioactive adrenomedullin dynamics and microcirculatory changes in a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vekla Carolin, Hartmann Oliver, Decker Sebastian O, von der Forst Maik, Uhle Florian, Studier-Fischer Alexander, Özdemir Berkin, Nickel Felix, Katzenschlager Stephan, Weilbacher Frank, Brenner Thorsten, Popp Erik, Weigand Markus A, Schmidt Karsten, Dietrich Maximilian, Gruneberg Daniel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic shock is a leading cause of preventable trauma death, marked by impaired oxygen delivery and endothelial dysfunction. Bioactive adrenomedullin (bio-ADM) regulates endothelial barrier integrity, but its dynamics during hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation remain unclear. This secondary analysis of a porcine hemorrhagic shock model investigated bio-ADM and its association with macro- and microcirculatory parameters during resuscitation. All animals received crystalloid infusion (10 mL/kg/h) from anesthesia induction onward. Shock was induced by blood withdrawal to maintain MAP at 40 ± 5 mmHg for 60 min (T5), before randomization to control (n = 7), fluid (n = 6), or noradrenaline (n = 7) groups, with intervention groups titrated to MAP targets of 65 then 90 mmHg (60 min each). Macrocirculation was assessed via vital signs and pulse contour analysis; microcirculation via hyperspectral imaging (tissue oxygenation, hemoglobin, water index).
RESULTS: Fluid resuscitation improved macrohemodynamics and microcirculatory oxygenation versus control and noradrenaline, which failed to sustain perfusion and impaired microcirculatory oxygenation. Bio-ADM increased after shock induction (p < 0.001), peaking at T9 (120 min of therapy). At T5, levels were comparable among control (16.8 [13.6-18.9] pg/ml), fluid (15.65 [15.43-16.55] pg/ml), and noradrenaline (14.3 [7.85-18.95] pg/ml). Thereafter, bio-ADM continued to rise in control (19.7 [17.4-32.6] pg/ml) and noradrenaline (21.2 [14.4-33.45] pg/ml), while stabilizing in the fluid group (12.05 [10.65-15.18] pg/ml); accordingly, the T5-T9 increase was smaller in the fluid group than in control (p = 0.022) or noradrenaline (p = 0.003). The fluid group received ~3-fold more fluid by T9. Higher bio-ADM correlated with lower MAP, higher lactate, and lower ScvO₂, but not oxygen delivery (DO₂); a higher tissue water index correlated with a smaller rise.
CONCLUSIONS: Bio-ADM increased during hemorrhagic shock, extending previous observations from cardiogenic and septic shock, and represents a comparatively non-specific marker of endothelial and microcirculatory stress rather than specific to any single shock etiology. Effective resuscitation was associated with stabilization, rather than a clear decrease, of bio-ADM levels, though this coincided with higher fluid administration, and dilution cannot be excluded. Whether bio-ADM offers therapeutic utility to guide resuscitation remains unclear, warranting further prospective evaluation in animal and human studies.
RESULTS: Fluid resuscitation improved macrohemodynamics and microcirculatory oxygenation versus control and noradrenaline, which failed to sustain perfusion and impaired microcirculatory oxygenation. Bio-ADM increased after shock induction (p < 0.001), peaking at T9 (120 min of therapy). At T5, levels were comparable among control (16.8 [13.6-18.9] pg/ml), fluid (15.65 [15.43-16.55] pg/ml), and noradrenaline (14.3 [7.85-18.95] pg/ml). Thereafter, bio-ADM continued to rise in control (19.7 [17.4-32.6] pg/ml) and noradrenaline (21.2 [14.4-33.45] pg/ml), while stabilizing in the fluid group (12.05 [10.65-15.18] pg/ml); accordingly, the T5-T9 increase was smaller in the fluid group than in control (p = 0.022) or noradrenaline (p = 0.003). The fluid group received ~3-fold more fluid by T9. Higher bio-ADM correlated with lower MAP, higher lactate, and lower ScvO₂, but not oxygen delivery (DO₂); a higher tissue water index correlated with a smaller rise.
CONCLUSIONS: Bio-ADM increased during hemorrhagic shock, extending previous observations from cardiogenic and septic shock, and represents a comparatively non-specific marker of endothelial and microcirculatory stress rather than specific to any single shock etiology. Effective resuscitation was associated with stabilization, rather than a clear decrease, of bio-ADM levels, though this coincided with higher fluid administration, and dilution cannot be excluded. Whether bio-ADM offers therapeutic utility to guide resuscitation remains unclear, warranting further prospective evaluation in animal and human studies.