Intensive & critical care nursing · 2026
Risk factors and preventive strategies for pressure injury and medical device-related pressure injury in ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation: A scoping review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Iryanidar Irma, Mukai Kanae, Nakajima Yukari, Abu Muhammad, Arisanty Irma Puspita, Yamada Amika, Oe Makoto
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Adult ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are at risk of pressure injury (PI) and medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) due to immobility, impaired perfusion, and device contact. This scoping review synthesized evidence on PI and MDRPI risk factors and preventive strategies.
METHODS: This scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect) were searched from inception to April 2026. Studies of adult ICU patients receiving IMV reporting PI, MDRPI, risk factors, or preventive strategies were eligible.
RESULTS: Forty-two studies from 14 countries (2009-2026) were included. PI incidence ranged from 10.3 to 36.3% (up to 88.7% when prone-positioned); MDRPI (oral mucosal injury) ranged from 25.9 to 43.1% (80.1% with a broader erythema criterion). Cutaneous PI mainly affected the sacrum, heels, occiput, face, and thorax (generally Stage 1-2); oral mucosal MDRPI, assessed using heterogeneous severity criteria, was typically mild-to-moderate. Onset was commonly reported on days 3-9. PI risk factors included immobility, impaired perfusion, vasopressor therapy, and poor nutrition; MDRPI risk factors involved prolonged intubation and device exposure. Preventive strategies included device repositioning, securement adjustment, device-contact protection, and oral care.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged mechanical loading and reduced tissue tolerance are intensified by immobility, sedation, hemodynamic instability, impaired perfusion, vasopressor use, and device exposure. Early-stage cutaneous PI and mild-to-moderate mucosal MDRPI were more commonly reported than severe cutaneous and mucosal injuries; given the descriptive, non-comparative evidence, this cannot be attributed to preventive effectiveness. Early monitoring may be important for detecting early-stage injury and identifying progression toward more severe injury.
IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Prevention should combine pressure redistribution with tolerance-based repositioning, skin monitoring, device securement, device-contact protection, and oral mucosal care. An exploratory, hypothesis-generating observation is that the first 10 days of ICU stay may be a high-risk period, requiring prospective validation.
METHODS: This scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect) were searched from inception to April 2026. Studies of adult ICU patients receiving IMV reporting PI, MDRPI, risk factors, or preventive strategies were eligible.
RESULTS: Forty-two studies from 14 countries (2009-2026) were included. PI incidence ranged from 10.3 to 36.3% (up to 88.7% when prone-positioned); MDRPI (oral mucosal injury) ranged from 25.9 to 43.1% (80.1% with a broader erythema criterion). Cutaneous PI mainly affected the sacrum, heels, occiput, face, and thorax (generally Stage 1-2); oral mucosal MDRPI, assessed using heterogeneous severity criteria, was typically mild-to-moderate. Onset was commonly reported on days 3-9. PI risk factors included immobility, impaired perfusion, vasopressor therapy, and poor nutrition; MDRPI risk factors involved prolonged intubation and device exposure. Preventive strategies included device repositioning, securement adjustment, device-contact protection, and oral care.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged mechanical loading and reduced tissue tolerance are intensified by immobility, sedation, hemodynamic instability, impaired perfusion, vasopressor use, and device exposure. Early-stage cutaneous PI and mild-to-moderate mucosal MDRPI were more commonly reported than severe cutaneous and mucosal injuries; given the descriptive, non-comparative evidence, this cannot be attributed to preventive effectiveness. Early monitoring may be important for detecting early-stage injury and identifying progression toward more severe injury.
IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Prevention should combine pressure redistribution with tolerance-based repositioning, skin monitoring, device securement, device-contact protection, and oral mucosal care. An exploratory, hypothesis-generating observation is that the first 10 days of ICU stay may be a high-risk period, requiring prospective validation.