Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
Heterogeneous Response Patterns to Multispecies Probiotics in Patients With Constipation During Pregnancy: An Exploratory Analysis of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhiyue Xu, Le Zhou, Shengjie Ding, Ling Feng, Zhengping Wang, Guocheng Liu, Qinghua Cai, Hongbo Chen, Xinling Zhao, Yan Liu, Lili Gao, Xiaohua Hou, Tao Bai, Xinghui Liu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multispecies probiotics in patients with constipation during pregnancy.
METHODS: This Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted across 10 hospitals in China. One hundred and twenty-two pregnant females with constipation were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either multispecies probiotics or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a mean CSBM frequency of ≥ 3 per week across the entire 8-week treatment period, together with an increase of ≥ 1 CSBM per week from the baseline weekly average.
RESULTS: The overall response rate did not differ significantly between probiotics (22.78%) and placebo groups (20.51%) (p = 0.779). Weekly response rates showed different temporal patterns between groups (P for interaction = 0.024); however, this did not result in a significant between-group difference at Week 8. In post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses, for patients with baseline SBM < 3/week, baseline straining score ≤ 2, baseline stool consistency score ≤ 2 (Type 1 or 2), and gestational weeks > 20 weeks, the weekly response rate in probiotics increased faster during the treatment period. The probiotic treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Multispecies probiotics were safe and well tolerated during pregnancy but did not significantly improve the prespecified primary endpoint within an 8-week treatment period. Post hoc subgroup analyses suggested potentially heterogeneous response trajectories according to baseline bowel frequency, straining severity, stool consistency, and gestational age; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution.
METHODS: This Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted across 10 hospitals in China. One hundred and twenty-two pregnant females with constipation were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either multispecies probiotics or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a mean CSBM frequency of ≥ 3 per week across the entire 8-week treatment period, together with an increase of ≥ 1 CSBM per week from the baseline weekly average.
RESULTS: The overall response rate did not differ significantly between probiotics (22.78%) and placebo groups (20.51%) (p = 0.779). Weekly response rates showed different temporal patterns between groups (P for interaction = 0.024); however, this did not result in a significant between-group difference at Week 8. In post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses, for patients with baseline SBM < 3/week, baseline straining score ≤ 2, baseline stool consistency score ≤ 2 (Type 1 or 2), and gestational weeks > 20 weeks, the weekly response rate in probiotics increased faster during the treatment period. The probiotic treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Multispecies probiotics were safe and well tolerated during pregnancy but did not significantly improve the prespecified primary endpoint within an 8-week treatment period. Post hoc subgroup analyses suggested potentially heterogeneous response trajectories according to baseline bowel frequency, straining severity, stool consistency, and gestational age; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution.