MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of thoracic disease · 2026
Automatic transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of patients with mitral valve prolapse: comparison with patients without structural cardiac chamber remodeling (an exploratory study).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vieira Marcelo Luiz Campos, Rodrigues Ana C T, Daminello Edgar, Reche Adriana, de Almeida Gustavo P, Oliveira Alessandra J, Santos Luiz O A, Piveta Rafael B, Meirelles Rodrigo A C, Monaco Cláudia G, Oliveira Fernando C, Solis Fernando A, Oliveira Wercules, Lianza Alessandro C, Sanudo Adriana, Lira Filho Edgar B, Curcio Sérgio A F, Poffo Robinson, Fischer Cláudio H, Morhy Samira S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information concerning automatic mitral valve apparatus (MVA) analysis of patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). We aimed to study with an automatic three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-dedicated software, patients with moderate and severe mitral regurgitation when compared to patients with no structural cardiac chamber alterations [patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) who underwent TEE].
METHODS: We employed TEE software dedicated to automatic analysis of 34 parameters of the MVA, comparing MVP patients with moderate and severe mitral regurgitation and patients with PFO without cardiac chamber structural alterations. Mitral valve effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) and regurgitant volume were correlated to automatic MVP parameters.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine MVP patients and 43 PFO patients were analyzed. All MVP patients presented P2 MVP, 15 (25.4%) with both posterior and anterior prolapse. Twenty-seven automatic parameters (79%) were different concerning MVP and PFO patients (P<0.05): diameters, area, perimeter, height, angle, coaptation width, length, closure line length, and annulus. ERO was 0.43±0.11 cm2, and regurgitant volume was 62.9±14.9 mL/beat. Automatic analysis correlated to 75th percentile ERO MVP patients (ERO >0.48 cm2): posterior leaflet area (r=0.74, P=0.03); posterior leaflet length (r=0.73, P=0.03); tenting area (r=0.41, P=0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic mitral valve parameters differed significantly between patients with MVP and those without structural cardiac chamber remodeling. In exploratory analysis, patients in the upper range of ERO values (≥75th percentile) showed patterns involving posterior leaflet geometry that were consistent with the associations observed in continuous-variable analysis. These findings support the potential role of automated 3D assessment in the anatomical characterization of MVP.
METHODS: We employed TEE software dedicated to automatic analysis of 34 parameters of the MVA, comparing MVP patients with moderate and severe mitral regurgitation and patients with PFO without cardiac chamber structural alterations. Mitral valve effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) and regurgitant volume were correlated to automatic MVP parameters.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine MVP patients and 43 PFO patients were analyzed. All MVP patients presented P2 MVP, 15 (25.4%) with both posterior and anterior prolapse. Twenty-seven automatic parameters (79%) were different concerning MVP and PFO patients (P<0.05): diameters, area, perimeter, height, angle, coaptation width, length, closure line length, and annulus. ERO was 0.43±0.11 cm2, and regurgitant volume was 62.9±14.9 mL/beat. Automatic analysis correlated to 75th percentile ERO MVP patients (ERO >0.48 cm2): posterior leaflet area (r=0.74, P=0.03); posterior leaflet length (r=0.73, P=0.03); tenting area (r=0.41, P=0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic mitral valve parameters differed significantly between patients with MVP and those without structural cardiac chamber remodeling. In exploratory analysis, patients in the upper range of ERO values (≥75th percentile) showed patterns involving posterior leaflet geometry that were consistent with the associations observed in continuous-variable analysis. These findings support the potential role of automated 3D assessment in the anatomical characterization of MVP.