Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
Development and External Testing of an Interpretable MRI-Based Machine Learning Model for Differentiating Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma from Cellular Leiomyoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Yue, Lu Yuanyuan, Zhang Feiran, Ning Yan, Jin Wentao, Cai Shulei, Xu Zhuoting, Zhang Guofu, Zhang He
Аннотация
This retrospective two-center diagnostic study was aimed at developing and externally testing an interpretable MRI-based machine learning model for differentiating endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) from cellular leiomyoma (CL). A total of 155 women with pathologically confirmed ESS or CL were assigned to a derivation cohort (n = 111) and an external testing cohort (n = 44). Clinical variables, qualitative MRI features, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram parameters were evaluated. Three MRI-derived predictors-irregular tumor margin, cystic areas on T2-weighted imaging, and mean ADC-were used to train six classifiers. The final support vector machine model with a radial basis function kernel was evaluated at a fixed threshold determined in the derivation cohort using receiver operating characteristic, calibration, decision curve, and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analyses. A reader study assessed the effect of model assistance. The model achieved areas under the curve of 0.843 (95% CI, 0.760-0.917) in the derivation cohort and 0.835 (95% CI, 0.669-0.960) in the external testing cohort. Calibration and decision curve analyses indicated acceptable performance and potential clinical utility. In an exploratory model-assisted reader analysis, junior radiologist specificity increased from 46.4 to 82.1% and accuracy from 52.3 to 77.3%. This interpretable three-feature model demonstrated promising performance across cohorts and may serve as an adjunctive tool for preoperative MRI assessment, although prospective multicenter validation is warranted.