MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.53045/jprs.2025-0092

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025

A Case of Congenital Nasal Septal Cartilage Hypoplasia Requiring Secondary Rhinoplasty in Adulthood: Considerations on Timing and Graft Selection.

Shibasaki Yukako, Tomioka Yoko, Oba Jun, Okazaki Mutsumi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Treatment of nasal septal defects or hypoplasia requires careful, long-term planning. We report a case of a 20-year-old male with congenital nasal septal cartilage hypoplasia who underwent auricular cartilage grafting at age 5 and costal cartilage transplantation at age 11. At adult evaluation, the nasal root was low, and the previously reconstructed L-strut was undersized for the matured facial skeleton, resulting in a short nose deformity. Revision surgery used re-harvested costal cartilage for dorsal and L-strut reconstruction and auricular dermochondral grafts for lining and rim support. Costal cartilage was readily available from the prior donor site, while auricular cartilage was limited due to previous use and donor-site concerns. Two years postoperatively, nasal aesthetics and facial balance improved markedly, with high patient and family satisfaction. This case underscores the importance of anticipating postpubertal facial growth, planning early reconstruction accordingly, selecting grafts strategically, and recognizing the likely need for secondary reconstruction in adulthood.

Для цитирования: Shibasaki Yukako, Tomioka Yoko, Oba Jun, Okazaki Mutsumi. A Case of Congenital Nasal Septal Cartilage Hypoplasia Requiring Secondary Rhinoplasty in Adulthood: Considerations on Timing and Graft Selection.. Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.53045/jprs.2025-0092.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.