MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fnins.2026.1875642

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026

Convolutional neural networks in brain disease diagnosis: a unified review of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and brain tumor classification.

Nathea R, Ghosh Kalyanbrata, Nisha J S

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Neurological and neuro-oncological brain disorders like Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and brain tumors are challenging to diagnose due to overlapping symptoms and the limitations of conventional imaging techniques. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has emerged as a powerful approach, enabling automated and high-precision detection and staging. This review critically integrates recent developments in CNN architectures, such as hybrid models, attention mechanisms, and 3D CNNs for MRI-based diagnosis of these disorders. It further examines preprocessing methods, datasets, and performance metrics across studies, with emphasis on innovations such as transformer-based models and lightweight architectures. While CNNs show impressive accuracy, issues remain in generalizability, interpretability, and clinical integration. This review highlights the need for multimodal data fusion, explainable artificial intelligence, and real-world validation to narrow the gap between research and clinical practice. By defining future directions, this review aims to guide the development of robust, scalable neurodiagnostic systems for early intervention and better patient outcomes.

Для цитирования: Nathea R, Ghosh Kalyanbrata, Nisha J S. Convolutional neural networks in brain disease diagnosis: a unified review of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and brain tumor classification.. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2026.1875642.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.