MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/19160216261451777

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2026

Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards for Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Bouchard-Locat Karl, Raby Vincent, Christopoulos Apostolos, Bahig Houda, Schwartz Russell, Tabet Paul, Belzile Mathieu, Ayad Tareck

Систематический обзорСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into clinical decision-making, including applications in pathology, radiomics, and multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT) for head and neck (ENT) cancer. However, the current scope and performance of AI tools within MDT settings remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the existing literature on the use and performance of AI models in MDT decision-making for ENT cancer.

DESIGN/

SETTING

Systematic review.

PARTICIPANTS

Studies assessing AI applications in MDT for head and neck (ENT) cancer.

INTERVENTIONS: A systematic search of Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Scopus was conducted from database inception to March 4, 2025. Studies were included without language or date restrictions. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: AI performance across 4 key domains: therapy option selection, clinical recommendations, explanation capabilities, and summarization abilities.

RESULTS

Of 791 records screened, 37 underwent full-text review and 7 met inclusion criteria. Six AI models were evaluated, with ChatGPT-4 featured in 71% of included studies. Across assessed domains, ChatGPT-4 demonstrated superior performance compared to other models, particularly in therapy selection, recommendation quality, and explanatory capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence base regarding AI integration in MDT decision-making for ENT cancer remains limited and heterogeneous. Although ChatGPT-4 shows promising performance across multiple domains, concerns regarding clinical accuracy, consistency, and transparency persist. Further research is required to optimize AI reliability and validate its clinical utility.

RELEVANCE: Clarifying the capabilities and limitations of AI within MDT settings is essential to ensure safe integration into oncologic decision-making and to support future development of reliable, transparent AI-assisted clinical tools.

Для цитирования: Bouchard-Locat Karl, Raby Vincent, Christopoulos Apostolos, Bahig Houda, Schwartz Russell, Tabet Paul, Belzile Mathieu, Ayad Tareck. Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards for Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.. Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/19160216261451777.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.