Frontiers in psychology · 2026
Coach behaviors, coach-athlete relationships, and competitive psychological processes in elite sport: a temporal narrative synthesis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gül Oğuzhan, Toros Turhan, Gül Mehmet, Eryücel Mehmet Emre, Bülbül Cihan, Bayansalduz Mehmet
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Research on coach behavior, coach-athlete relationships, and competitive psychological processes has developed in partly separate literatures, limiting understanding of how these domains interact across an elite competitive cycle.
AIMS: This review examined how these domains are represented across foundation building, competitive maintenance, peak competition, and post-competition transition, while distinguishing direct temporal evidence from interpretive phase placement.
METHODS: Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed English-language studies published from January 2016 to 22 June 2026. Of 645 records identified, 481 unique records were screened, 205 underwent eligibility assessment, and 30 empirical studies were included.
RESULTS: Evidence was strongest for competitive maintenance and peak competition. Repeated-measures, diary, prospective, and event-based studies linked coaching behavior and relationship-related judgments with motivation, well-being, perceived justice, burnout, appraisal, coping, affect, confidence, and perceived performance. Evidence for foundation building was limited, while direct evidence on post-season evaluation and cross-cycle carryover was largely absent.
CONCLUSION: The proposed temporal framework should be viewed as an evidence-informed research architecture rather than an established causal sequence. It highlights phase-specific hypotheses for future research, coach education, and psychological support.
AIMS: This review examined how these domains are represented across foundation building, competitive maintenance, peak competition, and post-competition transition, while distinguishing direct temporal evidence from interpretive phase placement.
METHODS: Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed English-language studies published from January 2016 to 22 June 2026. Of 645 records identified, 481 unique records were screened, 205 underwent eligibility assessment, and 30 empirical studies were included.
RESULTS: Evidence was strongest for competitive maintenance and peak competition. Repeated-measures, diary, prospective, and event-based studies linked coaching behavior and relationship-related judgments with motivation, well-being, perceived justice, burnout, appraisal, coping, affect, confidence, and perceived performance. Evidence for foundation building was limited, while direct evidence on post-season evaluation and cross-cycle carryover was largely absent.
CONCLUSION: The proposed temporal framework should be viewed as an evidence-informed research architecture rather than an established causal sequence. It highlights phase-specific hypotheses for future research, coach education, and psychological support.