MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10597-026-01733-3

Медицинская библиотека · Community mental health journal · 2026

Agile Co-design in Public Mental Health: An Integrated Model for Continuous Service Improvement.

Tyler Jonathan, Wilson James, Bennetts Stephanie L, Tindall Rachel M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Co-design has become central to mental health reform in Australia, yet it is often applied episodically rather than as a continuous practice. In public mental health, service change must occur alongside ongoing service delivery, creating challenges for leaders seeking to apply co-design principles. Agile project management provides a structured approach for iterative, reflective, and adaptive collaboration. This paper proposes an Agile co-design model and illustrates its application through reflective analysis of implementation within a public mental health service in Victoria, Australia. This approach responds directly to the Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System mandate for authentic co-design and lived experience leadership in reform, moving beyond one-off project phases to embed co-design as an ongoing governance capability. Evidence suggests that Agile approaches improve delivery pace and cross-functional collaboration in healthcare, while co-design strengthens service relevance, acceptability, and trust. As such, Agile co-design may provide a mechanism for incorporating consumer and clinician voices within continuous system reform, complementing existing co-design frameworks.

Для цитирования: Tyler Jonathan, Wilson James, Bennetts Stephanie L, Tindall Rachel M. Agile Co-design in Public Mental Health: An Integrated Model for Continuous Service Improvement.. Community mental health journal. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-026-01733-3.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.