MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.053

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2024

Rhinophyma treatment: An observational study comparing the results of the cold blade technique and ablative fractional CO2-laser.

Amiri Sahar Vanessa, Laustsen-Kiel Cecilie Mullerup, Carlsen Berit, Taudorf Elisabeth, Hesselfeldt Jørgen, Jemec Gregor Borut, Kaae Jeanette

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Experts have widely discussed rhinophyma treatment, proposing and testing various therapies over the years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the aesthetic outcomes of patients undergoing the cold blade technique at the Department of Plastic Surgery and ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment at the Department of Dermatology at Zealand University Hospital. We assessed rhinophyma severity using the RHISI scale with pre-and post-operative photographs evaluated by senior consultants from each department, who were blinded to the treatment method. Additionally, the patients completed a questionnaire to gauge their satisfaction and willingness to recommend the procedure. Cosmetic outcomes were deemed excellent or good (75% for surgery and 71% for CO2-laser) in both treatment methods. Only one patient answered with moderate satisfaction. Therefore, we recommend both methods as possible treatment options.

Для цитирования: Amiri Sahar Vanessa, Laustsen-Kiel Cecilie Mullerup, Carlsen Berit, Taudorf Elisabeth, Hesselfeldt Jørgen, Jemec Gregor Borut, Kaae Jeanette. Rhinophyma treatment: An observational study comparing the results of the cold blade technique and ablative fractional CO2-laser.. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.053.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.