Urologic oncology · 2026
Transitioning from template-based groin dissection to dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile cancer: Prospective validation of a standardization step.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Prakash Gagan, Shaikh Sarah, Arora Amandeep, Pal Mahendra, Misra Ankit, Gujela Ajit, Bakshi Ganesh, Rangarajan Venkatesh, Agrawal Archi, Menon Santosh
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (DSNB) offers accurate inguinal staging in clinically node-negative (cN0) penile cancer (PeCa), but implementation requires multidisciplinary expertise and standardization. We evaluated the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a standardized dual-tracer DSNB protocol during transition from modified/superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (MILD/SILD).
METHODS: In this prospective, non-randomized phase II study, 20 patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0 PeCa underwent DSNB followed by MILD and SILD in both groins. DSNB used 99mTc-nanocolloid and indocyanine green (ICG). Sentinel nodes were identified using lymphoscintigraphy/SPECT-CT, gamma-probe and near-infrared fluorescence, and assessed by frozen section. Final SILD pathology served as the reference standard for calculating the false-negative rate (FNR).
RESULTS: Forty groins were evaluated. DSNB successfully identified sentinel nodes in 37/40 (92.5%) groins; ICG identified nodes in 36 (90%) compared with 28 (70%) for 99mTc. Five groins contained metastatic sentinel nodes, all detected by DSNB, yielding 100% sensitivity and 0% FNR. In 4/37 (10.8%) successful procedures, sentinel nodes lay outside the MILD template. Median sentinel node yield was 4 versus 12 nodes with SILD. Median drain duration and hospital stay were 21 and 3 days, respectively. Eleven patients (55%) had no complications; grade 2 and 3a complications occurred in 20% and 25%, respectively. After median follow-up of 34 months, no inguinal nodal recurrences occurred.
CONCLUSION: A standardized dual-tracer DSNB protocol was feasible and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy during phased implementation at a tertiary cancer centre. Initial validation alongside template dissection may facilitate safe adoption, particularly in settings without centralized PeCa services.
METHODS: In this prospective, non-randomized phase II study, 20 patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0 PeCa underwent DSNB followed by MILD and SILD in both groins. DSNB used 99mTc-nanocolloid and indocyanine green (ICG). Sentinel nodes were identified using lymphoscintigraphy/SPECT-CT, gamma-probe and near-infrared fluorescence, and assessed by frozen section. Final SILD pathology served as the reference standard for calculating the false-negative rate (FNR).
RESULTS: Forty groins were evaluated. DSNB successfully identified sentinel nodes in 37/40 (92.5%) groins; ICG identified nodes in 36 (90%) compared with 28 (70%) for 99mTc. Five groins contained metastatic sentinel nodes, all detected by DSNB, yielding 100% sensitivity and 0% FNR. In 4/37 (10.8%) successful procedures, sentinel nodes lay outside the MILD template. Median sentinel node yield was 4 versus 12 nodes with SILD. Median drain duration and hospital stay were 21 and 3 days, respectively. Eleven patients (55%) had no complications; grade 2 and 3a complications occurred in 20% and 25%, respectively. After median follow-up of 34 months, no inguinal nodal recurrences occurred.
CONCLUSION: A standardized dual-tracer DSNB protocol was feasible and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy during phased implementation at a tertiary cancer centre. Initial validation alongside template dissection may facilitate safe adoption, particularly in settings without centralized PeCa services.