The Journal of nursing education · 2026
Designing Clinical Evaluation: Moving From Traditional Grading to Competency Determination.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duran Kendra, Johnson Jennifer, Hardee Ebony
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Competency-based nursing education requires clinical evaluation approaches that support defensible competency determination. Although existing literature describes assessment tools and psychometric properties, limited guidance exists on designing evaluation systems aligned with competency frameworks.
METHOD: A focused review of contemporary literature examined how evidence-based principles of clinical competency assessment can inform clinical evaluation design aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing Essentials.
RESULTS: Evidence supports evaluation approaches grounded in observable performance, structured assessment processes, and clearly defined expectations. However, many approaches emphasize developmental progression rather than threshold-based competency determination. Findings highlight a gap between available assessment tools and evaluation systems that support consistent competency decisions. This paper demonstrates how evidence-based principles can be translated into a structured clinical evaluation tool.
CONCLUSION: Intentional evaluation system design supports consistent, transparent, and defensible decisions regarding readiness for practice.
METHOD: A focused review of contemporary literature examined how evidence-based principles of clinical competency assessment can inform clinical evaluation design aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing Essentials.
RESULTS: Evidence supports evaluation approaches grounded in observable performance, structured assessment processes, and clearly defined expectations. However, many approaches emphasize developmental progression rather than threshold-based competency determination. Findings highlight a gap between available assessment tools and evaluation systems that support consistent competency decisions. This paper demonstrates how evidence-based principles can be translated into a structured clinical evaluation tool.
CONCLUSION: Intentional evaluation system design supports consistent, transparent, and defensible decisions regarding readiness for practice.