Current Alzheimer research · 2026
Transitioning from Clinical Trial to Clinical Practice for Long-Term Lecanemab Treatment in Early Alzheimer's Disease: Perspectives from a Cohort Study from the Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Watson David, Neam Michael G, Stafford Mark, Bouchard Cynthia, Ranney Venessa, Werner Sydney
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Lecanemab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, significantly reduces amyloid markers and slows clinical decline in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. We assessed our single-center experience with lecanemab, including evaluating efficacy and safety data as well as patient-reported outcomes of individuals from our single center treated with intravenous or subcutaneous lecanemab.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, nested cohort study of early AD subjects on lecanemab (intravenous or subcutaneous) at our center. Participants had been initiated on lecanemab therapy as part of lecanemab Study 201 or Clarity AD, and then continued lecanemab treatment in our center. Data collection included patient demographic characteristics, efficacy (eg, CDR-SB), safety, and patient-reported outcomes from surveys.
RESULTS: At our center, 136 people were randomized to receive either lecanemab or placebo in either lecanemab Study 201 (lecanemab:53; placebo:16) or Clarity AD (lecanemab:37; placebo:30). Patients receiving lecanemab were more likely to have higher rates of stable or improved disease across efficacy assessments relative to placebo. There were no new long-term safety signals, and the most common adverse events for lecanemab patients were infusion-related reactions (36.2%), ARIA-H (25.9%), and ARIA-E (13.8%). Survey responses demonstrated high satisfaction with the subcutaneous lecanemab administration, including with treatment satisfaction (97%) and convenience (97%). All patients preferred subcutaneous over IV dosing, citing quickness, ease, and comfort.
DISCUSSION: Our single-center experience with long-term lecanemab treatment was similar to that observed in clinical trials.
CONCLUSION: The subcutaneous lecanemab formulation was highly preferred by patients and care partners, with feedback highlighting reduced treatment burden and strong acceptability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, nested cohort study of early AD subjects on lecanemab (intravenous or subcutaneous) at our center. Participants had been initiated on lecanemab therapy as part of lecanemab Study 201 or Clarity AD, and then continued lecanemab treatment in our center. Data collection included patient demographic characteristics, efficacy (eg, CDR-SB), safety, and patient-reported outcomes from surveys.
RESULTS: At our center, 136 people were randomized to receive either lecanemab or placebo in either lecanemab Study 201 (lecanemab:53; placebo:16) or Clarity AD (lecanemab:37; placebo:30). Patients receiving lecanemab were more likely to have higher rates of stable or improved disease across efficacy assessments relative to placebo. There were no new long-term safety signals, and the most common adverse events for lecanemab patients were infusion-related reactions (36.2%), ARIA-H (25.9%), and ARIA-E (13.8%). Survey responses demonstrated high satisfaction with the subcutaneous lecanemab administration, including with treatment satisfaction (97%) and convenience (97%). All patients preferred subcutaneous over IV dosing, citing quickness, ease, and comfort.
DISCUSSION: Our single-center experience with long-term lecanemab treatment was similar to that observed in clinical trials.
CONCLUSION: The subcutaneous lecanemab formulation was highly preferred by patients and care partners, with feedback highlighting reduced treatment burden and strong acceptability.