Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD · 2024
From CO2 to Er:YAG: A Comprehensive Review of Laser Treatments for Rhinophyma.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamrani Payvand, Boen Monica, Fabi Sabrina G, Goldman Mitchel P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Rhinophyma, a benign condition resulting in nasal sebaceous tissue hypertrophy, predominantly affects Caucasian males. There are numerous surgical and medical treatments for rhinophyma with varying degrees of success. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of ablative therapies, highlighting our preferred treatment approach.
METHODS: This review analyzes the evidence behind ablative lasers in treating rhinophyma, with a focus on the 10600 nm carbon dioxide (CO2) and 2940 nm erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG).
RESULTS: Both CO2 and Er:YAG have demonstrated efficacy in treating rhinophyma. CO2 laser ablation results in a higher incidence of scarring and hypopigmentation. Er:YAG has high water absorption, which results in less thermal damage, allowing for quicker healing and fewer complications.
CONCLUSION: Management of rhinophyma can remain challenging; however, ablative lasers are an effective treatment. Both laser types have promising outcomes, each with different advantages and complications. In particular, Er:YAG presents fewer complications compared to CO2 lasers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(11):932-936. doi:10.36849/JDD.8199.
METHODS: This review analyzes the evidence behind ablative lasers in treating rhinophyma, with a focus on the 10600 nm carbon dioxide (CO2) and 2940 nm erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG).
RESULTS: Both CO2 and Er:YAG have demonstrated efficacy in treating rhinophyma. CO2 laser ablation results in a higher incidence of scarring and hypopigmentation. Er:YAG has high water absorption, which results in less thermal damage, allowing for quicker healing and fewer complications.
CONCLUSION: Management of rhinophyma can remain challenging; however, ablative lasers are an effective treatment. Both laser types have promising outcomes, each with different advantages and complications. In particular, Er:YAG presents fewer complications compared to CO2 lasers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(11):932-936. doi:10.36849/JDD.8199.