MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/07448481.2026.2746416

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2026

Gambling in fraternity and sorority life: leadership perspectives on social influences, risk, and prevention.

Stanmyre Jackie F, Cohen Alexander, Nower Lia

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

To examine Greek life leaders' perceptions of gambling prevalence, peer influences, capacity for member support, and prevention strategies.

Participants

Eleven Greek life leaders from a northeastern university were recruited in Summer/Fall 2025.

Methods

The qualitative study used semi-structured interviews analyzed using a thematic approach combining collaborative deductive and inductive coding.

Results

Gambling-notably online sports betting and poker-was described as widespread in fraternities, where it is normalized within the social culture and integrated into recruitment and other social activities. Leaders noted that the private nature of online gambling makes problematic involvement difficult to identify. Participants highlighted limited gambling-specific resources and a lack of university-level gambling policy and education.

Conclusions

Findings illustrate how fraternity social environments may normalize and reinforce gambling while its increasingly online nature makes escalating problems difficult to detect. These insights highlight the need for institutional gambling policies and prevention initiatives tailored to Greek life, ideally incorporating personal testimony.

Для цитирования: Stanmyre Jackie F, Cohen Alexander, Nower Lia. Gambling in fraternity and sorority life: leadership perspectives on social influences, risk, and prevention.. Journal of American college health : J of ACH. 2026. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2026.2746416.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.