Clinical oral implants research · 2026
Clinical Accuracy of Complete Arch Implant Scans Recorded by Using a Customized Metallic Ring-Based Calibrated Framework: An In Vivo Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gómez-Polo Miguel, Vasquez-Ramos Solange, Revilla-León Marta, Cascos Rocío
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate and compare the positional accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital implant scans obtained using a conventional scan body protocol and a customized metallic ring-based calibrated framework.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A completely edentulous arch restored with six implants was scanned using two complete arch intraoral digital impression protocols: a conventional scan body protocol (SB) and a metallic ring-based calibrated framework (CF). Twenty scans were obtained per group using the same intraoral scanner. A coordinate measuring machine (CMM) dataset served as the reference standard. All STL files were imported into dental CAD software to design a standardized virtual implant-supported bar, which was subsequently analyzed using reverse engineering software. Linear inter-implant distances and angular deviations were calculated. Trueness was defined as the absolute deviation from the CMM reference, and precision as the variability among repeated scans. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent t-tests with Welch correction and Holm adjustment (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: The mean linear deviation was 0.034 (0.004) mm for CF and 0.124 (0.019) mm for SB (p < 0.01). The mean angular deviation was 0.31 (0.05) degrees for CF and 0.55 (0.10) degrees for SB (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The calibrated splinting protocol showed greater trueness and lower variability compared with the conventional scan body approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A completely edentulous arch restored with six implants was scanned using two complete arch intraoral digital impression protocols: a conventional scan body protocol (SB) and a metallic ring-based calibrated framework (CF). Twenty scans were obtained per group using the same intraoral scanner. A coordinate measuring machine (CMM) dataset served as the reference standard. All STL files were imported into dental CAD software to design a standardized virtual implant-supported bar, which was subsequently analyzed using reverse engineering software. Linear inter-implant distances and angular deviations were calculated. Trueness was defined as the absolute deviation from the CMM reference, and precision as the variability among repeated scans. Between-group comparisons were performed using independent t-tests with Welch correction and Holm adjustment (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: The mean linear deviation was 0.034 (0.004) mm for CF and 0.124 (0.019) mm for SB (p < 0.01). The mean angular deviation was 0.31 (0.05) degrees for CF and 0.55 (0.10) degrees for SB (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The calibrated splinting protocol showed greater trueness and lower variability compared with the conventional scan body approach.