Clinical interventions in aging · 2026
Screening for Geriatric Problems in Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis Using a Self-Administered Battery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Burks Collin E, Morton-Oswald Sarah N, Clinton Deirdre T, Davis Aliyah, Ramirez Andy, Rutledge Jeanette L, Colón-Emeric Cathleen S, Bowling C Barrett, Fish Laura J, Plantinga Laura C, Reaves Megan A, Wilson Jonathan A, Peskoe Sarah B, Hall Rasheeda K
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Older adults receiving hemodialysis experience geriatric problems that affect quality of life and contribute to high healthcare utilization but are often underrecognized in dialysis care. Scalable approaches to identifying these problems are needed. This study evaluated the agreement between a self-administered screening battery and a geriatrician telehealth evaluation and assessed the feasibility of implementing the screening battery in dialysis clinics.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants aged ≥55 receiving hemodialysis completed the Geriatric screen for Older adults receiving Dialysis (GOLD), a screening battery assessing seven geriatric problems: depression, anxiety, functional impairment, cognitive impairment, falls risk, limited social support, and low nutritional status, followed by a blinded geriatrician telehealth evaluation. Intra-problem agreement between the GOLD and geriatrician evaluation was assessed using Cohen's κ, and analyses evaluated alternative screening thresholds. Acceptability and feasibility of the GOLD were evaluated through participant and staff surveys.
RESULTS: The cohort included 50 participants [76% (n=38) Black race, 62% (n=31) male, 16% (n=8) Hispanic/Latino ethnicity] with a mean (SD) age of 68 (7.8) years and a median dialysis vintage of 3.5 [IQR (1, 12.5)] years. Geriatric problems were common, including fall risk (78% geriatrician; 90% GOLD), functional impairment (58% geriatrician; 44% GOLD), and low nutritional status (50% geriatrician; 40% GOLD). Agreement between the GOLD and geriatrician evaluation was substantial for anxiety (κ=0.74), functional impairment (κ=0.65), low nutritional status (κ=0.64), and limited social support (κ=0.65), but not for cognitive impairment, falls risk, or depression. Most participants (37 of 45) reported the GOLD was easy to complete, and a minority (16 of 50) required assistance.
CONCLUSION: The GOLD demonstrated agreement with geriatrician evaluation for many geriatric problems and was feasible to implement in dialysis clinics. These findings suggest potential utility for scalable geriatric screening in dialysis care, although further work is needed to confirm these findings in larger cohorts and to refine screening for cognitive impairment and other domains.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants aged ≥55 receiving hemodialysis completed the Geriatric screen for Older adults receiving Dialysis (GOLD), a screening battery assessing seven geriatric problems: depression, anxiety, functional impairment, cognitive impairment, falls risk, limited social support, and low nutritional status, followed by a blinded geriatrician telehealth evaluation. Intra-problem agreement between the GOLD and geriatrician evaluation was assessed using Cohen's κ, and analyses evaluated alternative screening thresholds. Acceptability and feasibility of the GOLD were evaluated through participant and staff surveys.
RESULTS: The cohort included 50 participants [76% (n=38) Black race, 62% (n=31) male, 16% (n=8) Hispanic/Latino ethnicity] with a mean (SD) age of 68 (7.8) years and a median dialysis vintage of 3.5 [IQR (1, 12.5)] years. Geriatric problems were common, including fall risk (78% geriatrician; 90% GOLD), functional impairment (58% geriatrician; 44% GOLD), and low nutritional status (50% geriatrician; 40% GOLD). Agreement between the GOLD and geriatrician evaluation was substantial for anxiety (κ=0.74), functional impairment (κ=0.65), low nutritional status (κ=0.64), and limited social support (κ=0.65), but not for cognitive impairment, falls risk, or depression. Most participants (37 of 45) reported the GOLD was easy to complete, and a minority (16 of 50) required assistance.
CONCLUSION: The GOLD demonstrated agreement with geriatrician evaluation for many geriatric problems and was feasible to implement in dialysis clinics. These findings suggest potential utility for scalable geriatric screening in dialysis care, although further work is needed to confirm these findings in larger cohorts and to refine screening for cognitive impairment and other domains.