Association between the Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota and osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study from NHANES among individuals aged ≥ 50 years.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The gut microbiota serves as a critical interface between the host's internal environment and external factors, influencing bone mass and quality by modulating immune homeostasis, mineral absorption, and the production of systemically active metabolites. In this context, the Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM) provides a valuable metric for quantifying diet quality in relation to microbiota health. Therefore, investigating the association between DI-GM and the risk of osteoporosis (OP) is important for developing evidence-based dietary prevention guidelines.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
This cross-sectional study leveraged data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in 2005-2010 and 2013-2014. Multivariable weighted logistic regression (WLR) models were employed to ascertain the association between DI-GM and the prevalence of OP. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were leveraged to explore the dose-response relationship between DI-GM and OP. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were performed to validate the reliability of the findings.
RESULTS
Our analysis included 8,065 U.S. adults aged ≥ 50 years. The multivariable WLR analysis revealed that the risk of OP significantly decreased with increasing DI-GM scores (OR = 0.929, 95% CI: 0.874-0.988, p = 0.021). Relative to the cohort with the lowest DI-GM scores, the highest DI-GM cohort exhibited a 36.1% lower risk of OP (OR = 0.639, 95% CI: 0.441-0.925, p = 0.019). RCS analysis indicated a negative linear correlation between DI-GM and OP (p non-linear = 0.281).
CONCLUSIONS
Higher DI-GM scores were associated with lower risk of OP, indicating a protective role for diets that enhance GM diversity.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.