Association between Gompertz law-based biological age (GOLD BioAge) and incident mild cognitive impairment: Modifying role of social activeness.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an important transitional stage between normal cognitive aging and dementia. Biomarker-based biological age may better capture physiological aging processes than chronological age, yet its association with the risk of developing MCI remains insufficiently studied.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to examine the association between Gompertz Law-Based Biological Age (Light BioAge) and incident MCI in a middle-aged and older Chinese population, and to explore whether social activeness modifies this association.
METHODS
We used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, a nationally representative cohort. Light BioAge was calculated from chronological age, serum creatinine, fasting glucose, and C-reactive protein. Incident MCI was defined using age- and education-standardized cognitive assessments. Cox regressions were used to analysis.
RESULTS
Among 9410 participants free of MCI at baseline, 1047 developed MCI during follow-up. Light BioAge was negatively associated with risk of MCI (hazards ratio (HR) = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99). Compared to high Light BioAge, those in the moderate and low groups showed significantly lower risks of MCI (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94 and HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.97, respectively). The association were consistent across sex and different levels of social activeness, with no significant interaction observed.
CONCLUSIONS
Lower biological age, as estimated by Light BioAge, is independently associated with a reduced risk of MCI in middle-aged and older adults. The use of biomarker-based aging indicators may help identify individuals at higher risk of cognitive decline for early preventive strategies.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.