Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026
The Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Angle May Estimate Pelvic Tilt in Patients with Severe Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Leg Length Discrepancy Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Avci Özgür, Öztürk Alpaslan, Akalın Yavuz, Çevik Nazan, Çetin Oğuz, Yeşilbursalı Furkan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Spinopelvic movement disorders are associated with instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). In patients with Crowe type 3-4 developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and leg length discrepancy (LLD), sagittal radiographs may not allow accurate assessment of spinopelvic motion. This study aimed to evaluate the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle, a coronal plane parameter, as a predictor of calculated pelvic tilt (PT).
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with neglected unilateral Crowe type 3-4 DDH who underwent THA were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative SFP angle and sacral slope (SS) were measured, and preoperative PT was calculated using postoperative pelvic incidence and preoperative SS values.
RESULTS: The SFP angle showed a strong negative correlation with calculated PT (r = -0.77, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that the SFP angle was a significant predictor of PT (β = -1.02, 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.72; adjusted R 2 = 0.58). The regression model demonstrated a root mean square error of 5.46°.
CONCLUSIONS: The SFP angle may serve as an indirect surrogate for calculated PT in patients with Crowe type 3-4 DDH and LLD when preoperative sagittal spinopelvic assessment is not feasible prior to THA or spinal deformity surgery.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with neglected unilateral Crowe type 3-4 DDH who underwent THA were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative SFP angle and sacral slope (SS) were measured, and preoperative PT was calculated using postoperative pelvic incidence and preoperative SS values.
RESULTS: The SFP angle showed a strong negative correlation with calculated PT (r = -0.77, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that the SFP angle was a significant predictor of PT (β = -1.02, 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.72; adjusted R 2 = 0.58). The regression model demonstrated a root mean square error of 5.46°.
CONCLUSIONS: The SFP angle may serve as an indirect surrogate for calculated PT in patients with Crowe type 3-4 DDH and LLD when preoperative sagittal spinopelvic assessment is not feasible prior to THA or spinal deformity surgery.