Transplacental transfer of maternal binding and neutralizing antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus - An assay specific comparison.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infections in young children. Maternal antibodies can protect infants against RSV in the first months of life. Assessing antibody transfer efficiency by comparing infant to maternal antibody titers (C/M) is important for determining timing for maternal vaccination.
METHODS
We used 5 IgG antibody enzyme immunoassays with the RSV F (Fwt) or prefusion-stabilized F (FPre) proteins, G (subgroup A (Ga) or B (Gb)) proteins, or RSV lysate antigens and 2 neutralization assays, one for each RSV subgroup, and compared C/M ratios across different assays. We tested 164 mother-child specimen pairs, including 124 preterm and 40 full-term infants.
RESULTS
Matched-pair analysis of all specimen pairs indicated that the median C/M ratio and interquartile range (IQR) for anti-Fwt (1.064; IQR 0.739, 1.555) and anti-Lysate (1.062, IQR 0.710, 1.519) antibodies were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than anti-Ga (1.009, IQR 0.585, 1.295), anti-Gb (0.977, IQR 0.607, 1.350) antibodies and higher than RSV-A (1.000, IQR 0.567, 1.437) and RSV-B (1.000, IQR 0.688, 1.437) neutralizing antibodies, and anti-FPre (1.023, IQR 0.635, 1.367) antibodies. Differences in transfer efficiencies between assays were affected by gestational age - preterm infants had higher C/M ratios for neutralizing compared to binding antibodies, while full-term infants had higher C/M ratios for binding than neutralizing antibodies.
CONCLUSION
There are assay differences in C/M ratios, and this study provides insights into the effect of assay choice on determining transfer patterns and guides selection of study assays and comparison of results among studies.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.