Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Fear-EEG-AI: A Conceptual and Operational Framework for Designing EEG-AI Systems for the Inference of Fear-Compatible Neurophysiological States.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Serna Bladimir, Salazar Ricardo, Alonso-Silverio Gustavo A, Baltazar Rosario, Ventura-Molina Elías, Alarcón-Paredes Antonio
Аннотация
Electroencephalography (EEG) and artificial intelligence (AI) are central tools in affective computing, yet fear-related inference remains constrained by a gap between experimental performance and deployable evidence: high accuracy on controlled datasets guarantees neither neurobiological specificity, nor robustness across users, nor traceable inference. EEG does not measure fear directly; it captures cortical dynamics compatible with threat processing, arousal or vigilance. This paper introduces the Fear-EEG-AIFramework, a technology-independent architecture for designing, validating and deploying EEG-AI systems targeting fear-compatible neurophysiological states. Building on a prior systematic review, it organizes development into three hierarchical levels-neurobiological foundation, neuroelectric correlates and computational modeling-governed by six cross-cutting principles, and makes them evaluable through eight observable dimensions, the Fear-EEG-AI Alignment Index (FAI) and five validation evidence levels. Applied to the eight eligible studies of that corpus by two raters who had not drafted the instrument, with adjudication by a third, the rubric reached 67.2% exact agreement (quadratic-weighted κ=0.741; ICC(2,1) =0.744). Under 10,000 admissible weightings the equal-weight ordering survived in 10.1% of draws, and one of 56 ordered pairs met a stability criterion fixed before the pairwise results were tabulated. The index is therefore reported as a descriptor of methodological documentation and not as a ranking of implementations.