Pediatric surgery international · 2026
Machine learning in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Haoyang, Zhou Ying, Wang Xin, Wang Chen, Guo Sijia, Sun Miaomiao, Li Shuai, Wang Yong
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate current evidence on machine learning (ML) for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) and summarize its diagnostic performance and potential clinical utility.
METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched (January 2016-November 2025) for studies applying ML to HSCR diagnosis. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Findings were narratively synthesized, with exploratory meta-analysis performed where feasible.
RESULTS: Eleven studies were included, with substantial heterogeneity in design, data modalities, and outcomes. Three barium enema-based studies were eligible for meta-analysis, showing pooled sensitivity of 0.857 (95% CI 0.738-0.936), specificity of 0.880 (95% CI 0.790-0.941), and an area under the curve of 0.927. In rectal biopsy-based studies, ML-assisted approaches appeared to reduce interpretation time, while evidence for improved diagnostic performance remains limited and heterogeneous.
CONCLUSION: ML may have potential value in supporting HSCR diagnosis, particularly when combined with imaging and clinical data. In histopathology, ML appears more likely to serve as an assistive tool to improve efficiency and potentially enhance diagnostic performance rather than replace expert interpretation. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed before routine clinical implementation.
METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched (January 2016-November 2025) for studies applying ML to HSCR diagnosis. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Findings were narratively synthesized, with exploratory meta-analysis performed where feasible.
RESULTS: Eleven studies were included, with substantial heterogeneity in design, data modalities, and outcomes. Three barium enema-based studies were eligible for meta-analysis, showing pooled sensitivity of 0.857 (95% CI 0.738-0.936), specificity of 0.880 (95% CI 0.790-0.941), and an area under the curve of 0.927. In rectal biopsy-based studies, ML-assisted approaches appeared to reduce interpretation time, while evidence for improved diagnostic performance remains limited and heterogeneous.
CONCLUSION: ML may have potential value in supporting HSCR diagnosis, particularly when combined with imaging and clinical data. In histopathology, ML appears more likely to serve as an assistive tool to improve efficiency and potentially enhance diagnostic performance rather than replace expert interpretation. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed before routine clinical implementation.