MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2967/jnumed.126.272351

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026

Brain-Specific Quantification of Somatostatin Receptor Expression: SUVmax and SUVRsss as Quantitative Correlates of the Krenning Score in Meningioma.

Marulanda-Corzo Valentina, Farid Michael, Hill Trevor, Haghdel Arsalan, Ricaurte-Fajardo Andres, Otis Hannah G, Vu Kellen Vo, RoyChoudhury Arindam, Roytman Michelle, Brandmaier Andrew, Magge Rajiv S, Johnson Derek R, Osborne Joseph R, Perlow Haley K, Kutuk Tugce, Palmer Joshua, Ivanidze Jana

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Somatostatin receptor type 2 is highly expressed in meningiomas and can be quantified using [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET. The Krenning score, originally developed for [111In]In-octreotide scintigraphy, remains the standard visual grading system for somatostatin receptor expression and is widely used to guide eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. However, visual grading may not optimally translate to intracranial disease. This study evaluated the relationship between brain-specific quantitative PET parameters-SUVmax and SUV ratio normalized to the superior sagittal sinus (SUVRsss)-and the Krenning score in meningioma.

Methods

This single-institution retrospective study included 44 patients (70 meningiomas) who underwent clinical vertex-to-thigh [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Quantitative parameters (SUVmax, SUVRsss, lesion size) were extracted from coregistered PET and MR images. Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed to assess associations between imaging variables and Krenning score. Differences in quantitative PET parameters across Krenning categories were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis test and Holm-Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis using the Youden J index identified optimal cutoffs for clinically relevant thresholds (Krenning score of <3 vs. ≥3 and 3 vs. 4).

Results

SUVRsss and SUVmax were strongly correlated with the Krenning score (SUVRsss: Spearman ρ = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82; SUVmax: Spearman ρ = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.85; P < 0.0001). PET parameters differed significantly across Krenning categories (all P < 0.001). SUVRsss optimal thresholds were 9.00 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96) for Krenning scores of 2 versus 3 and 29.84 (AUC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for Krenning scores of 3 versus 4. SUVmax optimal thresholds were 7.20 (AUC, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99) and 30.70 (AUC, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00), respectively.

Conclusion

SUVRsss and SUVmax are complementary quantitative correlates of Krenning scores 2-4 in [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET-visible, MRI-measurable meningiomas. Brain-only PET evaluation may provide an alternative to liver- and spleen-based visual grading and reduce the need for whole-body imaging in selected settings. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve-derived SUV thresholds correspond to Krenning scores used for eligibility for treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, supporting further evaluation of quantitative PET parameters for theranostic decision-making for patients with meningioma.

Для цитирования: Marulanda-Corzo Valentina, Farid Michael, Hill Trevor, Haghdel Arsalan, Ricaurte-Fajardo Andres, Otis Hannah G, Vu Kellen Vo, RoyChoudhury Arindam, Roytman Michelle, Brandmaier Andrew, Magge Rajiv S, Johnson Derek R, Osborne Joseph R, Perlow Haley K, Kutuk Tugce, Palmer Joshua, Ivanidze Jana. Brain-Specific Quantification of Somatostatin Receptor Expression: SUVmax and SUVRsss as Quantitative Correlates of the Krenning Score in Meningioma.. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.126.272351.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.