The British journal of surgery · 1983
The anal dilator in the conservative management of acute anal fissures.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McDonald P, Driscoll A M, Nicholls R J
Аннотация
Patients presenting with acute anal fissure were randomized into two treatment groups in a prospective clinical trial. Both groups received treatment for 3 weeks with a stool softener and lignocaine jelly. Those entered in group 1 (35 patients) were asked in addition to insert an anal dilator (no. 2) twice daily while those in group 2 (31 patients) applied the anaesthetic jelly without a dilator. At 6 weeks 11 (31.4 per cent) patients in group 1 and 12 (38.7 per cent) patients in group 2 had been referred for sphincterotomy owing to failure of the treatment. At 6 months this figure had risen to 14 (40 per cent) in group 1 and 15 (48.4 per cent) in group 2. This difference was not statistically significant, suggesting that the addition of a dilator to the conservative treatment regimen did not diminish the likelihood of surgery.