MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm15197533

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2026

Large Language Models as Decision Support in Breast Cancer Management: A Comparison with Multidisciplinary Team Decision-Making.

Dindelegan George Călin, Poupel Noé Yoshi François, Golea George Ionuț, Ilieș Radu Alexandru, Cristea Matei George, Filip Simona Ioana, Filip Gerald Gheorghe, Darii Eugeniu, Shahin Iyad, Ginghină Octav, Caziuc Alexandra

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

Breast cancer management relies on multidisciplinary team (MDT) decisions that integrate clinical, radiological, pathological, and patient-related factors. Large language models (LLMs) may support such decisions, but evidence based on real-world cases remains limited.

Methods

We evaluated the agreement between ChatGPT-5.5 (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) and real MDT management of patients with invasive breast cancer. In this single-center, retrospective, proof-of-concept study, standardized preoperative clinical vignettes for 86 patients with invasive breast carcinoma were independently evaluated by GPT-5.5 (frozen prompt, Medium reasoning mode, Web Search enabled). AI-generated recommendations were compared with the MDT reference standard across eight therapeutic domains (four surgical, four non-surgical), yielding 688 individual decisions. Agreement was summarized descriptively and with Cohen's κ.

Results

GPT-5.5 produced complete recommendations for all vignettes. Overall concordance was 90.8% (625/688). Agreement was highest for endocrine therapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy (100% each) and for axillary surgery (93.0%, κ  =  0.86), and lowest for breast reconstruction (80.2%), oncoplastic surgery (82.6%) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (83.7%). Surgical concordance was 85.8% (295/344). Discordances occurred predominantly in individualized surgical decisions; none were observed for endocrine therapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapy.

Conclusions

GPT-5.5 showed high overall concordance with real MDT decisions, particularly for guideline-driven systemic therapy, but was less reliable for individualized surgical planning. These findings should be regarded as exploratory and cannot be assumed to be generalizable across institutions or clinical settings. LLMs should complement, not replace, multidisciplinary expertise; prospective multicenter validation is warranted.

Для цитирования: Dindelegan George Călin, Poupel Noé Yoshi François, Golea George Ionuț, Ilieș Radu Alexandru, Cristea Matei George, Filip Simona Ioana, Filip Gerald Gheorghe, Darii Eugeniu, Shahin Iyad, Ginghină Octav, Caziuc Alexandra. Large Language Models as Decision Support in Breast Cancer Management: A Comparison with Multidisciplinary Team Decision-Making.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/jcm15197533.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.