Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
Impact of Limited English Proficiency on Glaucoma Outcomes, Access to Eye Care, and Health Literacy in the NIH All of Us Database.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Santina Ahmad, Liu Vicki, Puran Allan I, Banh Timothy, Yu Fei, Tseng Victoria L, Coleman Anne L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To explore the associations between limited English proficiency and glaucoma outcomes, access to eye care, and health literacy in a national database.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program with available health records and responses to surveys about language. Main Outcome Measures included glaucoma prevalence, severity, and surgical history as well as access to eye care and health literacy measures. Logistic regression analyses of associations between self-reported English proficiency and outcomes, adjusting for other demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, were conducted.
RESULTS: Of 79,635 individuals in the study population, 1268 (1.6%) had low English proficiency (LEP) and 3296 (4.1%) had a glaucoma diagnosis. Compared to those with high English proficiency (HEP), individuals with glaucoma with LEP had a higher likelihood of incisional glaucoma surgery (aOR = 4.79, 95% CI = 1.03-22.22). Those with LEP were more likely to understand health information only "some or none of the time" as opposed to "always" (aOR = 6.36, 95% CI = 1.17-34.57) and experience problems learning about medical conditions "sometimes or occasionally" as opposed to "never" (aOR = 3.18, 95% CI = 1.22-8.34). No statistically significant associations between LEP and glaucoma prevalence, severity, or eye care access were observed in adjusted analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with glaucoma, those with LEP had a higher likelihood of undergoing incisional glaucoma surgery. Although LEP does not cause increased surgery, this correlation suggests that the decision to operate and its acceptance by the patient are more likely in individuals with LEP. Future studies on improving health literacy may reduce this association.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program with available health records and responses to surveys about language. Main Outcome Measures included glaucoma prevalence, severity, and surgical history as well as access to eye care and health literacy measures. Logistic regression analyses of associations between self-reported English proficiency and outcomes, adjusting for other demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, were conducted.
RESULTS: Of 79,635 individuals in the study population, 1268 (1.6%) had low English proficiency (LEP) and 3296 (4.1%) had a glaucoma diagnosis. Compared to those with high English proficiency (HEP), individuals with glaucoma with LEP had a higher likelihood of incisional glaucoma surgery (aOR = 4.79, 95% CI = 1.03-22.22). Those with LEP were more likely to understand health information only "some or none of the time" as opposed to "always" (aOR = 6.36, 95% CI = 1.17-34.57) and experience problems learning about medical conditions "sometimes or occasionally" as opposed to "never" (aOR = 3.18, 95% CI = 1.22-8.34). No statistically significant associations between LEP and glaucoma prevalence, severity, or eye care access were observed in adjusted analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with glaucoma, those with LEP had a higher likelihood of undergoing incisional glaucoma surgery. Although LEP does not cause increased surgery, this correlation suggests that the decision to operate and its acceptance by the patient are more likely in individuals with LEP. Future studies on improving health literacy may reduce this association.