MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.09.007

Медицинская библиотека · Urologic oncology · 2026

Perioperative enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab, gemcitabine-cisplatin-durvalumab, and dose-dense MVAC in cisplatin-eligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A benefit-risk Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Subiela José Daniel, González-Padilla Daniel A, Scilipoti Pietro, Slusarczyk Aleksander, Pichler Renate, Guerrero-Ramos Félix, Artiles-Medina Alberto, Caño-Velasco Jorge, Aumatell Júlia, Krajewski Wojciech, Mertens Laura S, Teoh Jeremy Yuen-Chun, Contieri Roberto, Maiorano Brigida Anna, Claps Francesco, Del Giudice Francesco, D'Andrea David, Gajate Pablo, Guerrero Patricia, Gallioli Andrea, Villacampa Felipe, Acosta Eduardo Albers, Lozano Fernando, Carrion Albert, Afferi Luca, Crespo Luis, Marcq Gautier, Soria Francesco, Moschini Marco, Grobet-Jeandin Elisabeth, Albisinni Simone, Alvarez-Maestro Mario, San-José Manso Luis, Gomez Dos Santos Victoria, Roupret Morgan, Burgos Revilla Francisco Javier, Pradere Benjamin, Buisan Oscar, Young Academic Urologist (YAU) Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To compare the efficacy and safety of three perioperative regimens for cisplatin-eligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC); enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV + P), gemcitabine-cisplatin plus durvalumab (GC + Durva), and dose-dense MVAC (dd-MVAC), in the absence of head-to-head trials, using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). A systematic search through March 2026 identified phase III trials comparing perioperative regimens against GC in cisplatin-eligible MIBC. The primary analysis was a Bayesian NMA of event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and pathological complete response (pCR), with SUCRA rankings; risk of bias used RoB-2. Three trials (EV-304, NIAGARA, VESPER; 2,364 patients) formed a star-shaped network vs. GC, all regimens improved EFS-EV + P (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.70), GC + Durva (0.68, 0.56-0.82), dd-MVAC (0.74, 0.55-0.99), and OS, EV + P (0.65, 0.48-0.89), GC + Durva (0.75, 0.60-0.93), dd-MVAC (0.71, 0.52-0.97). EV + P ranked first across all endpoints (SUCRA: EFS 96%, OS 81%, pCR > 99%). Indirect comparisons between experimental regimens were non-significant for survival; only pCR favored EV + P over GC + Durva (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, P < 0.01) and dd-MVAC (OR 2.0, P < 0.01). GC + Durva showed no excess Grade ≥3 toxicity over GC (41% vs. 41%). This NMA provides the first quantitative benefit-risk framework integrating efficacy ranking, toxicity, and subgroup heterogeneity for these regimens. EV + P had the highest probability of improving EFS, OS, and pCR, with GC + Durva ranking second; although directionally consistent with each trial, the magnitude, ranking, and subgroup heterogeneity could not be quantified without indirect synthesis. GC + Durva offered the most favorable benefit-risk profile. Prospective head-to-head trials remain an unmet need.

Для цитирования: Subiela José Daniel, González-Padilla Daniel A, Scilipoti Pietro, Slusarczyk Aleksander, Pichler Renate, Guerrero-Ramos Félix, Artiles-Medina Alberto, Caño-Velasco Jorge, Aumatell Júlia, Krajewski Wojciech, Mertens Laura S, Teoh Jeremy Yuen-Chun, Contieri Roberto, Maiorano Brigida Anna, Claps Francesco, Del Giudice Francesco, D'Andrea David, Gajate Pablo, Guerrero Patricia, Gallioli Andrea, Villacampa Felipe, Acosta Eduardo Albers, Lozano Fernando, Carrion Albert, Afferi Luca, Crespo Luis, Marcq Gautier, Soria Francesco, Moschini Marco, Grobet-Jeandin Elisabeth, Albisinni Simone, Alvarez-Maestro Mario, San-José Manso Luis, Gomez Dos Santos Victoria, Roupret Morgan, Burgos Revilla Francisco Javier, Pradere Benjamin, Buisan Oscar, Young Academic Urologist (YAU) Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group. Perioperative enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab, gemcitabine-cisplatin-durvalumab, and dose-dense MVAC in cisplatin-eligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A benefit-risk Bayesian network meta-analysis.. Urologic oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.09.007.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.