MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001404

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023

Chicken bone-induced ileal perforation peritonitis mimicking duodenal perforation peritonitis: a case report.

Dev Santosh, Pokhrel Kailash Mani, Mulmi Utsha, Devkota Shishir, Dev Barsha, Bhattarai Abhishek

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Foreign body ingestion can lead to bowel perforation and peritonitis. We present a case of a 54-year-old male who ingested a chicken bone, resulting in ileal perforation that mimicked duodenal perforation peritonitis.

CASE PRESENTATION: The patient has a history of peptic ulcer disease and regularly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs over the counter, adding more evidence to the provisional diagnosis of duodenal perforation. Exploratory laparotomy revealed the ileal perforation and the chicken bone was successfully removed. Wedge resection of the perforated segment and ileo-ileal anastomosis were performed.

DISCUSSION: Although history, examination, and investigation were more in favor of duodenal ulcer, our patient had ileal perforation due to chicken bone. Prompt identification and early surgical intervention are crucial to prevent complications and reduce mortality rates. The patient had an uneventful recovery.

CONCLUSION

Timely referral to a tertiary care center is essential for early surgical intervention and successful management of bowel perforation caused by a foreign body.

Для цитирования: Dev Santosh, Pokhrel Kailash Mani, Mulmi Utsha, Devkota Shishir, Dev Barsha, Bhattarai Abhishek. Chicken bone-induced ileal perforation peritonitis mimicking duodenal perforation peritonitis: a case report.. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012). 2023. DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001404.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.