The Laryngoscope · 2026
Comparing Casual Observer Perception of Facial Paralysis Subtypes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Randall Nicholas R, Fearington Forrest W, Peraza Lazaro R, Dey Jacob K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is a spectrum of clinical presentations after facial nerve injury, from complete facial paralysis (CFP) to facial synkinesis (FS).
OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare how laypersons perceive faces with CFP versus FS.
METHODS: Lay observers were presented with standardized videos of 24 individuals' faces: 8 with CFP, 8 with FS, and 8 nonparalyzed Controls performing common facial expressions. Observers were given a questionnaire and asked to rate the faces on varying subjective measurements of facial perception.
RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty-seven observers completed the survey. Observers viewed Control faces most favorably with higher perceived attractiveness and quality of life than CFP (p < 0.01; p < 0.01) and FS (p = 0.02; p < 0.01) faces. FS faces were rated more favorably than CFP faces (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: There are measurable differences in how casual observers perceive faces with different subtypes of facial paralysis. Compared to nonparalyzed faces, both FS and CFP were viewed more negatively; however, CFP was perceived more negatively compared to FS.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare how laypersons perceive faces with CFP versus FS.
METHODS: Lay observers were presented with standardized videos of 24 individuals' faces: 8 with CFP, 8 with FS, and 8 nonparalyzed Controls performing common facial expressions. Observers were given a questionnaire and asked to rate the faces on varying subjective measurements of facial perception.
RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty-seven observers completed the survey. Observers viewed Control faces most favorably with higher perceived attractiveness and quality of life than CFP (p < 0.01; p < 0.01) and FS (p = 0.02; p < 0.01) faces. FS faces were rated more favorably than CFP faces (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: There are measurable differences in how casual observers perceive faces with different subtypes of facial paralysis. Compared to nonparalyzed faces, both FS and CFP were viewed more negatively; however, CFP was perceived more negatively compared to FS.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.