MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.113299

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of radiology · 2026

Clinical practice guidance for imaging selection in pulsatile tinnitus: an evidence-based expert consensus.

Chen Lanyue, Wang Han, Yu Dexin, Li Yongmei, Sun Hongzan, Zhang Bing, Huang Zhicheng, Yue Yunlong, Duan Xiaoyi, Gao Bo, Liu Zhaohui

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) is a rhythmic sound synchronized with the patient's heartbeat that represents a complex diagnostic challenge with a broad spectrum of vascular and non-vascular etiologies. Persistent symptoms can severely impact mental health, yet a specific causative abnormality can be identified via targeted radiological imaging in more than 75% of cases. Improper imaging selection frequently leads to misdiagnosis, reduced therapeutic efficacy, and increased healthcare costs. The choice of imaging protocol must be guided by a thorough initial clinical evaluation, including detailed medical history, physical maneuvers, and otoscopic examinations. Commissioned by the Medical Imaging Center Branch of the Chinese Hospital Association, this evidence-based expert consensus guidance aims to provide structured recommendations for the strategic selection of imaging modalities in PT patients. The guidance explicitly distinguishes recommendations grounded in comparative diagnostic literature from those derived from formal expert consensus where high-level comparative evidence is limited.

Для цитирования: Chen Lanyue, Wang Han, Yu Dexin, Li Yongmei, Sun Hongzan, Zhang Bing, Huang Zhicheng, Yue Yunlong, Duan Xiaoyi, Gao Bo, Liu Zhaohui. Clinical practice guidance for imaging selection in pulsatile tinnitus: an evidence-based expert consensus.. European journal of radiology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.113299.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.