Unlocking the power of reflection: how simulation debriefing shapes clinical decision-making and competence in nursing students.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Simulation debriefing is widely recognized as a critical component of simulation-based education, yet its specific contribution to clinical decision-making and competence development among undergraduate nursing students remains insufficiently explored.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the impact of simulation debriefing on clinical decision-making and nursing competence among nursing students and to determine whether clinical decision-making mediates this relationship.
METHODS
A multi-center, cross-sectional study was conducted among 650 third- and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students from two XX universities. Participants completed validated instruments assessing debriefing experiences, clinical decision-making, and nursing competence. Data were analysed using Pearson correlation, multiple regression analyses, and mediation analysis using the PROCESS macro.
RESULTS
Students demonstrated moderately high levels of debriefing experience, clinical decision-making, and competence. Simulation debriefing showed strong positive associations with both clinical decision-making and competence. Regression analyses identified debriefing quality and clinical rotation frequency as strong predictors. Mediation analysis revealed a significant partial mediation effect, indicating that debriefing improves competence partly by strengthening clinical decision-making processes.
CONCLUSIONS
Simulation debriefing plays a pivotal role in enhancing students' cognitive integration of simulation experiences, supporting the development of informed clinical judgment and competence. Strengthening debriefing practices is therefore essential for advancing simulation-based nursing education and supporting readiness for clinical practice.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.