MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm15197759

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2026

Long-Term Follow-Up After Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation in Boys Facing Gonadotoxic Therapies: Safety, Pubertal Development, Reproductive Outcomes, and Clinical Implications.

Paolini Lucia, Ferrari Vittorio, Cattini Umberto, Bortolamedi Elisa, Lanari Marcello, Baronio Federico

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Testicular tissue cryopreservation is increasingly offered to boys facing gonadotoxic therapies. Yet, its long-term clinical significance depends not only on future fertility-restoration technologies but also on how these patients evolve. This narrative review aims to synthesizes the available follow-up literature on boys who underwent testicular tissue cryopreservation, focusing on procedural safety, testicular growth, pubertal progression, endocrine function, semen outcomes in patients reaching adulthood, and the emerging question of whether cryopreserved tissue may ultimately be needed in all cases. We will compare follow-up strategies across centers, highlight the lack of standardized endpoints, and discuss how survivorship data may refine counseling, re-consent, and future management of cryopreserved tissue. The aim is to provide a clinically oriented overview of what current longitudinal cohorts can already tell us, while identifying the key evidence gaps that still limit harmonized follow-up protocols.

Для цитирования: Paolini Lucia, Ferrari Vittorio, Cattini Umberto, Bortolamedi Elisa, Lanari Marcello, Baronio Federico. Long-Term Follow-Up After Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation in Boys Facing Gonadotoxic Therapies: Safety, Pubertal Development, Reproductive Outcomes, and Clinical Implications.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/jcm15197759.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.