MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm15197574

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2026

Rater Dependence in Emergency Department Catheter-Appropriateness Audits: A Prospective Three-Rater Study of Item-Level Reliability.

Çetin Ömer, Danış Faruk

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

Catheter-appropriateness audits report a single rate without a measure of its reliability. We measured how far an emergency department (ED) estimate depends on the clinician applying the checklist, and which items carry that dependence.

Methods

We enrolled 117 consecutive adults catheterized in a tertiary ED between 21 January and 21 May 2026. Three emergency physicians independently classified every patient against a ten-item checklist drawn from the 2009 CDC/HICPAC guideline and the Ann Arbor criteria. A designated senior rater served as comparator, a clinical judgment rather than a criterion standard. We computed standalone rates, per-item Fleiss' κ and Gwet's AC1, patient-level agreement, and a post hoc counterfactual item-replacement analysis.

Results

Ten patients (8.5%, 95% CI 4.7-15.0) had no valid indication according to the senior rater. Auditing alone, the two index raters would have reported 0.9% and 25.6%. Pooled agreement over 1170 patient-by-indication decisions was substantial by κ (0.630 and 0.707) and almost perfect by AC1 (0.885 and 0.925); excluding the complementary item changed neither. Patient-level agreement was lower (three-rater κ 0.199, AC1 0.792). Disagreement concentrated in hourly urine-output monitoring (AC1 0.617) and neurogenic bladder, endorsed in 44 patients by one rater and none by another (AC1 0.668). That item accounted for 48% of one rater's excess endorsements; replacing that rater's item-5 ratings with the senior rater's narrowed the between-rater range from 30-fold to 6-fold.

Conclusions

In this cohort the audit rate was rater-dependent, and the dependence concentrated in identifiable checklist items. Item-level operational definitions and prospective calibration should be evaluated as strategies for improving audit reliability, and per-item agreement should be reported with a prevalence-robust coefficient alongside κ.

Для цитирования: Çetin Ömer, Danış Faruk. Rater Dependence in Emergency Department Catheter-Appropriateness Audits: A Prospective Three-Rater Study of Item-Level Reliability.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/jcm15197574.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.