Neurology · 2026
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion in Late Presenters: Proposed Target Expansion Criteria.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morotti Andrea, Pensato Umberto, Nawabi Jawed, Dell'Orco Andrea, Mazzacane Federico, Li Qi, Busto Giorgio, Cavallini Anna, Ornello Raffaele, Valente Mariarosaria, Merlino Giovanni, Baronchelli Giovanni, Berinato Francesco, Olivieri Emanuele, Giacomozzi Sebastiano, Magni Eugenio, Gentile Mauro, Paolucci Matteo, Forlivesi Stefano, Paciaroni Maurizio, Laudisi Michele, Sacco Simona, Romoli Michele, Casetta Ilaria, Fainardi Enrico, Zini Andrea, Padovani Alessandro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The benefit of therapies targeting hematoma expansion (HE) in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is highly time dependent and greatest within the first 2 hours after onset. We aimed to develop imaging-based "target expansion criteria" to identify late presenters (2-12 hours from onset/last seen well) who remain at high risk of HE. To achieve this goal, a practical risk score (target expansion score) was developed.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study. To mirror a clinical trial population, we excluded patients with brainstem ICH, anticoagulation, and baseline ICH volume >100 mL. The primary outcome was HE (>33%/6 mL). The following imaging predictors of HE were analyzed: high ultra-early hematoma growth (uHG) (baseline volume/onset to imaging time >10 mL/h), hypodensities on noncontrast CT (NCCT), and spot sign on CT angiography (CTA). The study population was randomly divided into development and validation cohorts, and a weighted score was derived from estimates from multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Overall, 492 patients were included: 345 (70.1%) in the development and 147 (29.9%) in the validation cohort. A 4-point score was created, based on independent predictors of HE (high uHG: 1 point, NCCT hypodensities: 1 point, and CTA spot sign: 2 points). The score showed good discrimination in the development and validation cohorts (area under the curve [AUC] 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83, and AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.87, respectively). We observed a nonlinear increase in the frequency of HE and mean absolute hematoma growth with higher scores: 9.8% and 0.9 mL (score 0), 17.1% and 3.9 mL (score 1), 48.3% and 11.5 mL (score 2), 70.8% and 13.0 mL (score 3), and 87.5% and 26.9 mL (score 4). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. A dichotomized score greater than or equal to 2 predicted HE with 0.61 sensitivity and 0.85 specificity in the development cohort and 0.64 sensitivity with 0.84 specificity in the validation cohort.
DISCUSSION: Imaging-based target expansion criteria, defined as a target expansion score ≥2, identified late-presenting patients with ICH at high risk of HE. These findings might inform future trials targeting HE and increase the pool of eligible patients.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study. To mirror a clinical trial population, we excluded patients with brainstem ICH, anticoagulation, and baseline ICH volume >100 mL. The primary outcome was HE (>33%/6 mL). The following imaging predictors of HE were analyzed: high ultra-early hematoma growth (uHG) (baseline volume/onset to imaging time >10 mL/h), hypodensities on noncontrast CT (NCCT), and spot sign on CT angiography (CTA). The study population was randomly divided into development and validation cohorts, and a weighted score was derived from estimates from multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Overall, 492 patients were included: 345 (70.1%) in the development and 147 (29.9%) in the validation cohort. A 4-point score was created, based on independent predictors of HE (high uHG: 1 point, NCCT hypodensities: 1 point, and CTA spot sign: 2 points). The score showed good discrimination in the development and validation cohorts (area under the curve [AUC] 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83, and AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.87, respectively). We observed a nonlinear increase in the frequency of HE and mean absolute hematoma growth with higher scores: 9.8% and 0.9 mL (score 0), 17.1% and 3.9 mL (score 1), 48.3% and 11.5 mL (score 2), 70.8% and 13.0 mL (score 3), and 87.5% and 26.9 mL (score 4). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. A dichotomized score greater than or equal to 2 predicted HE with 0.61 sensitivity and 0.85 specificity in the development cohort and 0.64 sensitivity with 0.84 specificity in the validation cohort.
DISCUSSION: Imaging-based target expansion criteria, defined as a target expansion score ≥2, identified late-presenting patients with ICH at high risk of HE. These findings might inform future trials targeting HE and increase the pool of eligible patients.