MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.mex.2026.104191

Медицинская библиотека · MethodsX · 2026

Indications, procedural standards, and training requirements for flexible nasolaryngoscopy in pulmonology - a Delphi study protocol.

Nair Ajit, Bardin Philip G, Leong Paul

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Flexible nasolaryngoscopy (FNL) is a well-established, minimally invasive procedure for assessing the nasal passages, nasopharynx, and larynx. Its role in pulmonology is expanding, particularly for evaluating vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction, chronic cough, and other upper airway conditions relevant to the "united airways" model of care. However, no consensus-based guidance currently exists on the indications, procedural standards, or training requirements for FNL performed by pulmonologists. This protocol describes a modified two-round Delphi study that will survey an international, purposively sampled panel of pulmonologists and otolaryngologists via an online platform hosted by Monash University, using a five-point Likert scale and pre-specified consensus thresholds (≥70% agreement). Findings will be discussed in a structured expert roundtable to support interpretation and contextualization. • Establishes expert consensus on clinical indications and contraindications for FNL in pulmonology practice. • Develops consensus on procedural standards, curriculum, and competency requirements for FNL training in pulmonology. • Identifies priority areas for future research to support integration of FNL into pulmonology services.

Для цитирования: Nair Ajit, Bardin Philip G, Leong Paul. Indications, procedural standards, and training requirements for flexible nasolaryngoscopy in pulmonology - a Delphi study protocol.. MethodsX. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2026.104191.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.