MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20250297

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026

Brain Stimulation as a Treatment for Apathy: A Scoping Review of Effects and Safety.

Grewal Parneet, Seidman Michael B, Chasen Joseph, Lench Daniel, Dickens Ivy, Brennan Emily A, Rodriguez-Porcel Federico, Kindred John, George Mark S, Kautz Steve, Caulfield Kevin A, McTeague Lisa M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Apathy is a neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by impairment of goal-directed behavior, cognition, and emotional responsiveness. In this scoping review, the authors evaluated the literature on brain stimulation for the treatment of patients with apathy across diagnostic categories and provide recommendations to guide future research and practice.

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo for studies involving brain stimulation for apathy as a primary or secondary outcome.

RESULTS

From 1,209 records, 52 studies evaluating brain stimulation were included; of these, 10 systematic reviews or meta-analyses were synthesized separately. Modalities included repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS; N=26), deep brain stimulation (DBS; N=7), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; N=6), electroconvulsive therapy (N=1), transcranial alternating current stimulation (N=1), and transcranial pulsating electromagnetic field therapy (N=1). Populations included patients with schizophrenia (N=477), Parkinson's disease (PD; N=289), depression (N=288), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (N=210), Huntington's disease (N=42), PD with MCI (N=28), traumatic brain injury (N=28), stroke (N=14), COVID-19 (N=12), and dementia with Lewy bodies (N=6) (total N=1,366). rTMS improved apathy measures, most consistently in AD, with positive trends in depression, MCI, stroke, and schizophrenia. tDCS showed variable effects, with some benefits for schizophrenia. DBS showed mixed results, varying with stimulation location. Observed adverse events were mild and modality specific.

CONCLUSIONS

Investigations into brain stimulation as a treatment for apathy show some promise. Conclusions were limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous study designs, and variable outcome measures. Randomized trials with common validated apathy instruments, standardized stimulation parameters, and harmonized diagnostic measures may help advance the field.

Для цитирования: Grewal Parneet, Seidman Michael B, Chasen Joseph, Lench Daniel, Dickens Ivy, Brennan Emily A, Rodriguez-Porcel Federico, Kindred John, George Mark S, Kautz Steve, Caulfield Kevin A, McTeague Lisa M. Brain Stimulation as a Treatment for Apathy: A Scoping Review of Effects and Safety.. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. 2026. DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20250297.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.